Literature DB >> 19242049

Direct determination of geometric alignment parameters for cone-beam scanners.

C Mennessier1, R Clackdoyle, F Noo.   

Abstract

This paper describes a comprehensive method for determining the geometric alignment parameters for cone-beam scanners (often called calibrating the scanners or performing geometric calibration). The method is applicable to x-ray scanners using area detectors, or to SPECT systems using pinholes or cone-beam converging collimators. Images of an alignment test object (calibration phantom) fixed in the field of view of the scanner are processed to determine the nine geometric parameters for each view. The parameter values are found directly using formulae applied to the projected positions of the test object marker points onto the detector. Each view is treated independently, and no restrictions are made on the position of the cone vertex, or on the position or orientation of the detector. The proposed test object consists of 14 small point-like objects arranged with four points on each of three orthogonal lines, and two points on a diagonal line. This test object is shown to provide unique solutions for all possible scanner geometries, even when partial measurement information is lost by points superimposing in the calibration scan. For the many situations where the cone vertex stays reasonably close to a central plane (for circular, planar, or near-planar trajectories), a simpler version of the test object is appropriate. The simpler object consists of six points, two per orthogonal line, but with some restrictions on the positioning of the test object. This paper focuses on the principles and mathematical justifications for the method. Numerical simulations of the calibration process and reconstructions using estimated parameters are also presented to validate the method and to provide evidence of the robustness of the technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242049      PMCID: PMC2860884          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: image-based correction of gantry motion nonidealities.

Authors:  R Fahrig; D W Holdsworth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analytic method based on identification of ellipse parameters for scanner calibration in cone-beam tomography.

Authors:  F Noo; R Clackdoyle; C Mennessier; T A White; T J Roney
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Characterization of pinhole SPECT acquisition geometry.

Authors:  Dirk Bequé; Johan Nuyts; Guy Bormans; Paul Suetens; Patrick Dupont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.

Authors:  Youngbin Cho; Douglas J Moseley; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Perturbative refinement of the geometric calibration in pinhole SPECT.

Authors:  Michel Defrise; Christian Vanhove; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A cone-beam reconstruction algorithm using shift-variant filtering and cone-beam backprojection.

Authors:  M Defrise; R Clack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Astigmatic single photon emission computed tomography imaging with a displaced center of rotation.

Authors:  H Wang; M F Smith; C D Stone; R J Jaszczak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Estimation of geometrical parameters and collimator evaluation for cone beam tomography.

Authors:  G T Gullberg; B M Tsui; C R Crawford; J G Ballard; J T Hagius
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reconstruction for fan beam with an angular-dependent displaced center-of-rotation.

Authors:  C R Crawford; G T Gullberg; B M Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Determination of both mechanical and electronic shifts in cone beam SPECT.

Authors:  J Li; R J Jaszczak; H Wang; K L Greer; R E Coleman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantifying the gantry sag on linear accelerators and introducing an MLC-based compensation strategy.

Authors:  Weiliang Du; Song Gao; Xiaochun Wang; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.

Authors:  J Chetley Ford; Dandan Zheng; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Task-driven source-detector trajectories in cone-beam computed tomography: II. Application to neuroradiology.

Authors:  Sarah Capostagno; J Webster Stayman; Matthew Jacobson; Tina Ehtiati; Clifford R Weiss; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-05-09

4.  Self-calibration of cone-beam CT geometry using 3D-2D image registration.

Authors:  S Ouadah; J W Stayman; G J Gang; T Ehtiati; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.

Authors:  M W Jacobson; M D Ketcha; S Capostagno; A Martin; A Uneri; J Goerres; T De Silva; S Reaungamornrat; R Han; A Manbachi; J W Stayman; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.