Literature DB >> 19224146

Quasi-IMAT study with conventional equipment to show high plan quality with a single gantry arc.

Judith Alvarez Moret1, Oliver Kölbl, Ludwig Bogner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: : Nowadays, intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for clinical use is mostly based on forward planning. The aim of this work is to investigate the potential of a step-and-shoot quasi-IMAT (qIMAT) technique to improve plan quality. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: : qIMAT plans with 18 and 36 beams were generated with a total number of 36 segments. Additionally, the number of segments was increased to 72, in order to investigate if the quality of the plans improves with the number of beams and segments. A conventional six-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan was used as a reference. The beam setup was applied to the CarPet phantom and to five prostate cancer patients.
RESULTS: : In the phantom case, the dose received by the organ at risk (OAR) decreased considerably by using qIMAT. At the same time, coverage and homogeneity of planning target volume (PTV) remained unaffected. For the prostate cases, a good dose coverage was accomplished inside the PTV. Rectum and bladder were better spared with qIMAT. When increasing the number of segments, only a slight improvement of the plan quality was observed.
CONCLUSION: : The study showed that qIMAT improves the sparing of OARs while keeping the uniformity within the PTV, when compared with conventional IMRT. The more concave the PTV, the more noticeable is this behavior. The qIMAT technique has the advantage that it can be realized with a conventional equipment. The plan quality is high even with a single gantry arc and one segment per beam direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224146     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-1890-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  23 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A 2-D diode array and analysis software for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery.

Authors:  Paul A Jursinic; Ben E Nelms
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance.

Authors:  Arthur J Olch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Performance analysis of a film dosimetric quality assurance procedure for IMRT with regard to the employment of quantitative evaluation methods.

Authors:  Peter Winkler; Brigitte Zurl; Helmuth Guss; Peter Kindl; Georg Stuecklschweiger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.

Authors:  Tilo Wiezorek; Nico Banz; Michael Schwedas; Marcel Scheithauer; Henning Salz; Dietmar Georg; Thomas G Wendt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with different combinations of treatment-planning systems and linacs: issues and how to detect them.

Authors:  Barbara Dobler; Friedlieb Lorenz; Hansjörg Wertz; Martin Polednik; Dirk Wolff; Volker Steil; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Local high-dose radiotherapy and sparing of normal tissue using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Stephan Konkel; Christoph Thilmann; Jürgen Debus; Daniela Schulz-Ertner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers.

Authors:  J Van Dyk; R B Barnett; J E Cygler; P C Shragge
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Helical tomotherapy as a new treatment technique for whole abdominal irradiation.

Authors:  Nathalie Rochet; Florian Sterzing; Alexandra Jensen; Julien Dinkel; Klaus Herfarth; Kai Schubert; Michael Eichbaum; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christof Sohn; Juergen Debus; Wolfgang Harms
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.

Authors:  Yasser Abo-Madyan; Martin Polednik; Angelika Rahn; Frank Schneider; Barbara Dobler; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.621

View more
  9 in total

1.  Treatment results of radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Tanja Langsenlehner; Carmen Döller; Franz Quehenberger; Heidi Stranzl-Lawatsch; Uwe Langsenlehner; Karl Pummer; Karin S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Erratum to: Evolution of educational inequalities in mortality among young adults in an urban setting.

Authors:  Hannelore De Grande; Patrick Deboosere; Hadewijch Vandenheede
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Quasi-VMAT in high-grade glioma radiation therapy.

Authors:  G Fadda; G Massazza; S Zucca; S Durzu; G Meleddu; M Possanzini; P Farace
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Impact of gantry rotation time on plan quality and dosimetric verification--volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Holger Wirtz; Johannes Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Curcumin decreases survival of Hep3B liver and MCF-7 breast cancer cells: the role of HIF.

Authors:  Mareike Ströfer; Wolfgang Jelkmann; Reinhard Depping
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Non-small cell lung cancer in stages I-IIIB: Long-term results of definitive radiotherapy with doses ≥ 80 Gy in standard fractionation.

Authors:  Karl Wurstbauer; Hannes Weise; Heinz Deutschmann; Peter Kopp; Florian Merz; Michael Studnicka; Olaf Nairz; Felix Sedlmayer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Commissioning and first clinical application of mARC treatment.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Frank G Nuesken; Stephanie Kremp; Jan Palm; Norbert P Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Moderate dose escalation in three-dimensional conformal localized prostate cancer radiotherapy: single-institutional experience in 398 patients comparing 66 Gy versus 70 Gy versus 74 Gy.

Authors:  Gregor Goldner; Johannes Dimopoulos; Christian Kirisits; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments.

Authors:  Klaus Bratengeier; Mark B Gainey; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.