PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome in prostate cancer patients treated at one single institution by the implementation of moderate dose escalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 398 patients with histologically verified localized prostate cancer (T1-3 Nx0 Mx0) were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with/without additional hormonal therapy. Risk group distribution was as follows: 106 low-risk (27%), 164 intermediate-risk (41%), and 128 high-risk (32%) patients. Total local dose was increased from 66 Gy (1994-1998) to 70 Gy (1998-2003) and 74 Gy (1998-2005). Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED: ASTRO/Phoenix definition) and late gastrointestinal/urogenital side effects (EORTC/RTOG) were assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 64 months. The 5-year bNED rates according to 66 Gy, 70 Gy and 74 Gy were 37%, 64% and 63% (ASTRO), and 54%, 74% and 69% (Phoenix), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age and T-stage were significant in predicting bNED. The 5-year bNED rates (ASTRO) according to 66 Gy, 70 Gy and 74 Gy were 40%, 78% and 73% in the low-risk group, 41%, 55% and 85% in the intermediate-risk group, and 30%, 53% and 52% in the high-risk group. Intermediate-risk patients showed a significant improvement of bNED by increasing the dose up to 74 Gy. The 5-year actuarial rates of gastrointestinal/urogenital side effects grade > or = 2 were 18%/16% (66 Gy), 20%/24% (70 Gy), and 27%/28% (74 Gy). CONCLUSION: A benefit of local doses at a level of > or = 70 Gy could be detected showing the highest increase of prostate-specific antigen control in the intermediate-risk group. The amount of patients reporting of severe late side effects is small.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome in prostate cancerpatients treated at one single institution by the implementation of moderate dose escalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 398 patients with histologically verified localized prostate cancer (T1-3 Nx0 Mx0) were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with/without additional hormonal therapy. Risk group distribution was as follows: 106 low-risk (27%), 164 intermediate-risk (41%), and 128 high-risk (32%) patients. Total local dose was increased from 66 Gy (1994-1998) to 70 Gy (1998-2003) and 74 Gy (1998-2005). Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED: ASTRO/Phoenix definition) and late gastrointestinal/urogenital side effects (EORTC/RTOG) were assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 64 months. The 5-year bNED rates according to 66 Gy, 70 Gy and 74 Gy were 37%, 64% and 63% (ASTRO), and 54%, 74% and 69% (Phoenix), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age and T-stage were significant in predicting bNED. The 5-year bNED rates (ASTRO) according to 66 Gy, 70 Gy and 74 Gy were 40%, 78% and 73% in the low-risk group, 41%, 55% and 85% in the intermediate-risk group, and 30%, 53% and 52% in the high-risk group. Intermediate-risk patients showed a significant improvement of bNED by increasing the dose up to 74 Gy. The 5-year actuarial rates of gastrointestinal/urogenital side effects grade > or = 2 were 18%/16% (66 Gy), 20%/24% (70 Gy), and 27%/28% (74 Gy). CONCLUSION: A benefit of local doses at a level of > or = 70 Gy could be detected showing the highest increase of prostate-specific antigen control in the intermediate-risk group. The amount of patients reporting of severe late side effects is small.
Authors: Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jinka R Sathya; Ian R Davis; Jim A Julian; Qing Guo; Dean Daya; Ian S Dayes; Himu R Lukka; Mark Levine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; M Hunt; H J Lee; D Lombardi; C C Ling; V E Reuter; E S Venkatraman; S A Leibel Journal: J Urol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthias D Hofer; Rainer Kuefer; Wei Huang; Haojie Li; Tarek A Bismar; Sven Perner; Richard E Hautmann; Martin G Sanda; Juergen E Gschwend; Mark A Rubin Journal: Urology Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Michael J Zelefsky; Jennifer Moughan; Jean Owen; Anthony L Zietman; Mack Roach; Gerald E Hanks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Martin Pursch-Lee; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: G Goldner; R Pötter; J J Battermann; M P Schmid; C Kirisits; S Sljivic; M van Vulpen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: WeiWei Xiao; Peter H Graham; Carl A Power; Jingli Hao; John H Kearsley; Yong Li Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: M Geier; S T Astner; M N Duma; V Jacob; C Nieder; J Putzhammer; C Winkler; M Molls; H Geinitz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-02-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Gregor Goldner; Richard Pötter; Alexander Kranz; Alexandra Bluhm; Wolfgang Dörr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Anja M Weidner; Emile N J Th van Lin; Dietmar J Dinter; Tom Rozema; Stefan O Schoenberg; Frederik Wenz; Jelle O Barentsz; Frank Lohr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 3.621