Literature DB >> 15773625

Performance analysis of a film dosimetric quality assurance procedure for IMRT with regard to the employment of quantitative evaluation methods.

Peter Winkler1, Brigitte Zurl, Helmuth Guss, Peter Kindl, Georg Stuecklschweiger.   

Abstract

A system for dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans using absolute calibrated radiographic films is presented. At our institution this verification procedure is performed for all IMRT treatment plans prior to patient irradiation. Therefore clinical treatment plans are transferred to a phantom and recalculated. Composite treatment plans are irradiated to a single film. Film density to absolute dose conversion is performed automatically based on a single calibration film. A software application encompassing film calibration, 2D registration of measurement and calculated distributions, image fusion, and a number of visual and quantitative evaluation utilities was developed. The main topic of this paper is a performance analysis for this quality assurance procedure, with regard to the specification of tolerance levels for quantitative evaluations. Spatial and dosimetric precision and accuracy were determined for the entire procedure, comprising all possible sources of error. The overall dosimetric and spatial measurement uncertainties obtained thereby were 1.9% and 0.8 mm respectively. Based on these results, we specified 5% dose difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement as our tolerance levels for patient-specific quality assurance for IMRT treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773625     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Quasi-IMAT study with conventional equipment to show high plan quality with a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Judith Alvarez Moret; Oliver Kölbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dose distribution verifications of IMRT for NPC.

Authors:  Qin Li; Liang Li; Jun Han; Zhiwen Liang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-11

3.  High-precision GAFCHROMIC EBT film-based absolute clinical dosimetry using a standard flatbed scanner without the use of a scanner non-uniformity correction.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Bart Lynch; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Clinical Experience of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Pre-Treatment Quality Assurance for Carcinoma Head and Neck Patients with EPID and IMatriXX in Rural Center.

Authors:  More M; Jain V; Gurjar O P
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Kiley B Pulliam; Elizabeth M McKenzie; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric verification of micro-MLC based intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Parminder Basran; Collins Yeboah
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.

Authors:  Baozhou Sun; Dharanipathy Rangaraj; Sunita Boddu; Murty Goddu; Deshan Yang; Geethpriya Palaniswaamy; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Omar Wooten; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.