Literature DB >> 19214597

Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Juan S Uribe1, Jaypal Reddy Sangala, Edward A M Duckworth, Fernando L Vale.   

Abstract

Retrospective comparative study of 80 consecutive patients treated with either anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF) or anterior cervical corpectomy fusion (ACCF) for multi-level cervical spondylosis. To compare clinical outcome, fusion rates, and complications of anterior cervical reconstruction of multi-level ACDF and single-/multi-level ACCF performed using titanium mesh cages (TMCs) filled with autograft and anterior cervical plates (ACPs). Reconstruction of the cervical spine after discectomy or corpectomy with titanium cages filled with autograft has become an acceptable alternative to both allograft and autograft; however, there is no data comparing the outcome of multi-level ACDF and single-/multi-level ACCF using this reconstruction. We evaluated 80 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylosis at our institution from 1998 to 2001. In this series, 42 patients underwent multi-level ACDF (Group 1) and 38 patients underwent ACCF (Group 2). Interbody TMCs and local autograft bone with ACPs were used in both procedures. Medical records were reviewed to assess outcome. Clinical outcome was measured by Odom's criteria. Operative time and blood loss were noted. Radiographs were obtained at 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (if necessary). Early hardware failures and pseudarthroses were noted. Cervical sagittal curvature was measured by Ishihara's index at 1 year. Group 1 had a mean age 46.2 years (range 35-60 years). Group 2 had a mean age 50.1 years (range 35-70 years).The operative time was significantly lower (P < 0.001) and blood loss significantly higher (P < 0.001) in Group 2 than in Group 1. At a minimum of 1 year follow up, patients in both groups had equivalent improvement in their clinical symptoms. The fusion rates for Group 1 were 97.6 and 92.1% for Group 2. The rates of early hardware failure were higher in Group 2 (2.6%) than in Group 1 (0%). The fusion rates for Group 1 were not significantly higher than Group 2 (P > 0.28). There was one patient in Group 1 and 2 patients in Group 2 with pseudarthroses. Complication rates in Group 2 were not significantly higher (P > 0.341). Cervical lordosis was well-maintained (80%) in both groups. Both multi-level ACDF and ACCF with anterior cervical reconstruction using TMC filled with autograft and ACP for treatment of multi-level cervical spondylosis have high fusion rates and good clinical outcome. However, there is a higher rate of early hardware failure and pseudarthroses after ACCF than ACDF. Hence, in the absence of specific pathology requiring removal of vertebral body, multi-level ACDF using interbody cages and autologous bone graft could result in lower morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19214597      PMCID: PMC3234010          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0897-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  63 in total

1.  Use of cervical stand-alone cages.

Authors:  Wolfgang Börm; Klaus Seitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  History of instrumentation for stabilization of the subaxial cervical spine.

Authors:  Ibrahim Omeis; Joseph A DeMattia; Virany Huynh Hillard; Raj Murali; Kaushik Das
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Anterior cervical fusion using homologous bone grafts: a comparative study.

Authors:  B L Rish; J T McFadden; J O Penix
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1976-02

4.  Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jesse Kim; Eric P Lorenz; Tae-Hong Lim; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A retrospective study of multiple interbody grafting and long segment strut grafting following multilevel anterior cervical decompression.

Authors:  A P Nirala; M Husain; D K Vatsal
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.

Authors:  Shiuh-Lin Hwang; Chih-Lung Lin; Ann-Shung Lieu; Kung-Shing Lee; Tai-Hung Kuo; Yan-Fen Hwang; Yu-Feng Su; Shen-Long Howng
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

7.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.

Authors:  Douglas B Moreland; Harold L Asch; David E Clabeaux; Gregory J Castiglia; Gregory A Czajka; P Jeffrey Lewis; James G Egnatchik; Andrew Cappuccino; Lien Huynh
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation.

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Francis H Shen; Don K Matthews; S Tim Yoon; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jen-Chung Liao; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Lih-Huei Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Joachim K Krauss; Dimitris Zevgaridis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042

View more
  31 in total

1.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

2.  Preoperative factors affecting length of stay after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without corpectomy: a multivariate analysis of an academic center cohort.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Jordan A Gruskay; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine Under-Represents Sagittal Plane Deformity in Degenerative Myelopathy Patients.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; Arunit J Chugh; Jeremy J Gebhart; Jason D Eubanks
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

4.  Anterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  John C Quinn; Paul D Kiely; Darren R Lebl; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-08

5.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Ming Gong; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-04

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension secondary to degenerative cervical spine pathology: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Aria Fallah; Paul J Muller; Howard J Ginsberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparisons of Two-level Discectomy and Fusion with Cage Alone versus Single-level Corpectomy and Fusion with Plate in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Bok Young Ha; Hong Bo Sim; In Uk Lyo; Eun Suk Park; Soon Chan Kwon; Jun Bum Park
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

8.  Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Sun-Jung Yoon; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Alexander Keiler; Helga Fritsch; Aldemar Andres Hegewald; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Multilevel segmental interbody fusion versus vertebral body replacement: comparison of two operative methods].

Authors:  D Daentzer; N Bianchi; D-K Böker; W Deinsberger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.