Literature DB >> 15112077

Use of cervical stand-alone cages.

Wolfgang Börm, Klaus Seitz.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15112077      PMCID： PMC3476589          DOI： 10.1007/s00586-004-0707-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN： 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Anatomic bases for anterior spinal surgery: surgical anatomy of the cervical vertebral body and disc space.

Authors:  J Lu; N A Ebraheim; H Yang; J Rollins; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Effects of disc height and distractive forces on graft compression in an anterior cervical discectomy model.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees; Constantine K Demetropoulos; King H Yang; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  [Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments].

Authors:  H J Wilke; A Kettler; L Claes
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft.

Authors:  David L Greene; Neil R Crawford; Robert H Chamberlain; Sung Chan Park; Dennis Crandall
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Ventral discectomy with pmma interbody fusion for cervical disc disease: long-term results in 249 patients.

Authors:  C Hamburger; F V Festenberg; E Uhl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Anterior cervical arthrodesis using DOC dynamic stabilization implant for improvement in sagittal angulation and controlled settling.

Authors:  Bikash Bose
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Implantation of an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage after single-level anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of cervical disc herniation: preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael Payer; Daniel May; Alain Reverdin; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Joachim K Krauss; Dimitris Zevgaridis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Outcomes Evaluation of Zero-Profile Devices Compared to Stand-Alone PEEK Cages for the Treatment of Three- and Four-Level Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Peter C Gerszten; Erin Paschel; Hazem Mashaly; Hatem Sabry; Hasan Jalalod'din; Khaled Saoud
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-09-10

3.  Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels.

Authors:  Ting-Hsien Kao; Chen-Hao Wu; Yu-Ching Chou; Hsien-Te Chen; Wen-Hsien Chen; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.067
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.