Literature DB >> 15347001

Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.

Shiuh-Lin Hwang1, Chih-Lung Lin, Ann-Shung Lieu, Kung-Shing Lee, Tai-Hung Kuo, Yan-Fen Hwang, Yu-Feng Su, Shen-Long Howng.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Cage-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of one- and two-level degenerative disc disease (DDD). To the authors' knowledge, clinical results after three- and four-level interbody cage-augmented ACDF have not been reported in the literature. The authors investigated the safety and effectiveness of titanium cages used in such procedures and evaluated the results in cases with or without plate fixation.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients suffering from cervical DDD were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 32 patients who underwent titanium cage-assisted ACDF; Group 2 included 24 patients who underwent the same procedure, supplemented with plate fixation. The cervical DDD was confirmed by radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. The patients underwent radiographic evaluation to assess cervical lordosis, segmental height of cervical spine, the height of the foramina, and spinal stability. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Neck pain was graded using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 28 months (mean 17.2 months). In both Groups 1 and 2 significant increase (p < 0.001) was demonstrated in the JOA scores (preoperatively 10.7 +/- 2.4 and 11.1 +/- 2, postoperatively 13.9 +/- 2.2 and 14.1 +/- 2.3, respectively) and VAS pain scores (preoperatively 8.8 +/- 0.9 and 8.5 +/- 1, postoperatively 3.1 +/- 2.1 and 2.8 +/- 1.8, respectively); however, there was no significant intergroup difference. A significant increase in the cervical lordosis, foraminal height, and segmental height was observed in both groups. Good stability of cage fusion was obtained in both groups 12 months postoperatively (90.6% in Group 1 and 91.7% in Group 2); however, there were no statistically significant intergroup differences. The complication rate in Group 2 was higher than that in Group 1. The hospital length of stay in Group 1 was significantly lower than in Group 2 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of these findings demonstrated that titanium cage-assisted ACDF provided long-term stabilization, increased lordosis, increased segmental height, and increased foraminal height. In both groups good neurological outcomes were achieved and donor site morbidity was avoided. The lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay, however, make the cage-assisted fusion without plate fixation better than with plate fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15347001     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  19 in total

1.  Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Pavel Barsa; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation.

Authors:  Mootaz Shousha; Ali Ezzati; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Huajing Chen; Peng Cao; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Wu; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Yu Liang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Feng; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Ming Gong; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-04

7.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Dario Romano; Francesco Certo; Pietro Milone; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Zhenggang Guo; Shuxun Hou; Yantao Zhao; Hongbin Zhong; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xinwei Wang; Xuhua Lu; Lili Yang; Haisong Yang; Wen Yuan; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.