Literature DB >> 19206805

Listening to every other word: examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech.

Gerald Kidd1, Virginia Best, Christine R Mason.   

Abstract

In a variation on a procedure originally developed by Broadbent [(1952). "Failures of attention in selective listening," J. Exp. Psychol. 44, 428-433] listeners were presented with two sentences spoken in a sequential, interleaved-word format. Sentence one (target) comprised the odd-numbered words in the sequence and sentence two (masker) comprised the even-numbered words in the sequence. The task was to report the words in sentence one. The goal was to determine the effectiveness of cues linking the words of the target (or masker) over time. Three such "linkage variables" were examined: (1) fixed talker, (2) fixed perceived interaural location, and (3) correct syntactic structure. All of the linkage variables provided a significant advantage when applied to the target compared to the baseline condition in which the linkage variables were randomized. However, these linkage variables were not effective when applied to the masker. Word position effects were found such that performance in the baseline condition declined, and the advantages of the linkage variables increased, for the words near the end of the sentence. Overall, this approach appears to be useful for examining interference in speech recognition that has little or no peripheral component. The results suggest that variables that link target words together improve their resiliency to interference and/or their recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19206805      PMCID: PMC2676624          DOI: 10.1121/1.2998980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P A Ahad; P A Crum; J O'Reilly
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  Alastair P Nicholls; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Failures of attention in selective listening.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-12

6.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Auditory image perception and analysis: the basis for hearing.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

10.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  61 in total

1.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech localization in a multitalker mixture.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Eric R Thompson; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A detection-theoretic framework for modeling informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas; Lynn Gilbertson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The intelligibility of pointillistic speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Timothy M Streeter; Antje Ihlefeld; Ross K Maddox; Christine R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectro-temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Adrian Y Cho; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.