Literature DB >> 29391671

Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?

Nalini Mishra1, Ruchi Gupta1, Nomita Singh1.   

Abstract

Introduction: The timeline between a decision made and delivery of the baby is termed decision delivery interval (DDI). According to current recommendations, an emergency caesarean section must be performed within 30 min of the decision. The present study was conducted with an objective to assess DDI in a busy obstetric unit in India and its impact on obstetric outcome. Material and Method: A total of 480 women with indications of category I (emergency): Immediate threat to life of woman or foetus (n = 66), and category II (urgent): Maternal or foetal compromise but not immediately life-threatening (n = 414), were studied in the context of DDI and composite adverse perinatal outcomes including fresh stillbirth, 5-min Apgar score <7 and NICU admission. Result: Recommended DDI of <30 min could be achieved in 30% cases of emergency CS only. Sixty-three per cent with prolapsed cord could be delivered within 30 min. The composite neonatal outcomes were not significantly increased up to DDI of 60 min for category I (emergency) (except in prolapsed cord) and up to 90 min in category II (urgent) caesarean sections.
Conclusion: Authors propose reconsideration of the present recommendations of DDI in categories I and II, while Crash CS (cord prolapse or catastrophic antepartum haemorrhage) should be a separate group with recommended DDI of 30 min. For the remaining cases in the present emergency CS group, the suggested DDI of 60 and, for urgent group, 90 min may be made following further studies to prevent this DDI yardstick from becoming a rod at our back.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Composite neonatal outcome; Cord prolapse; Decision–delivery interval; Foetal distress; Low-resource settings

Year:  2017        PMID: 29391671      PMCID: PMC5783908          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-017-0991-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  11 in total

1.  The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency Caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country.

Authors:  Renu Singh; Sujata Deo; Yashodhara Pradeep
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.731

2.  Urgent cesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia.

Authors:  Tak Yeung Leung; Pui Wah Chung; Michael Scott Rogers; Daljit Singh Sahota; Terence Tzu-Hsi Lao; Tony Kwok Hung Chung
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Early perinatal outcome in cases delivered through Caesarian section following clinical diagnosis of severe foetal distress at Kenyatta National Hospital.

Authors:  S K Rotich; M P Ndavi; R Rukaria-Kaumbutho; C S Kigondu
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2006-05

4.  Predictions for the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections in Norway.

Authors:  Toril Kolås; Dag Hofoss; Pål Oian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time.

Authors:  K K Roy; Jinee Baruah; Sunesh Kumar; A K Deorari; J B Sharma; Debjyoti Karmakar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Gilbert; John C Hauth; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up.

Authors:  Greg A Pearson; Brenda Kelly; Robin Russell; Susan Dutton; Jenny J Kurinczuk; Ian Z MacKenzie
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  A prospective study of the efficiency of the "code 333" process at the Ottawa hospital.

Authors:  Yaa Amankwah; Sharon Caughey; Mark Walker
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2011-03

9.  Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in Ghana? Results of analysis of early perinatal outcome.

Authors:  S A Oppong; M G Tuuli; J D Seffah; R M K Adanu
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

10.  Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution.

Authors:  Onyedikachi Edwin Chukwudi; Chukwunwendu Anthony Okonkwo
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.088

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Cesarean Sections and its Impact on Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  Janna-Alica Brandt; Bernd Morgenstern; Fabinshy Thangarajah; Berthold GrÜttner; Sebastian Ludwig; Christian Eichler; Jessika Ratiu; Peter Mallmann; Dominik Ratiu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tebabere Moltot Kitaw; Simachew Kassa Limenh; Fantahun Alemnew Chekole; Simegnew Asmer Getie; Belete Negese Gemeda; Abayneh Shewangzaw Engda
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Effect of decision to delivery interval on perinatal outcomes during emergency cesarean deliveries in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tebabere Moltot Kitaw; Birhan Tsegaw Taye; Mesfin Tadese; Temesgen Getaneh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.