Literature DB >> 19175109

Analysis of image quality for real-time target tracking using simultaneous kV-MV imaging.

W Luo1, S Yoo, Q J Wu, Z Wang, F-F Yin.   

Abstract

Real-time tracking can provide high accuracy localization for a moving target and minimize the effect of motion. Simultaneous kV-MV imaging has been proposed as a real-time tracking technique by utilizing the existing kV on-board imager (OBI) and the MV electronic portal device (EPID) mounted on the linear accelerator. The orthogonal pair of kV-MV images acquired simultaneously can provide 3-D localization in real-time. However, the kV and MV beams cross shooting the target interfere with each other with beam scattering, which affects the quality of images. The success of this modality heavily relies on the image quality, especially the visibility of the target, which was investigated in this study. The kV and MV images were acquired for a gold implant marker that was used as a surrogate of the target and placed in an IMRT thorax phantom, a dynamic phantom, and a pelvis phantom to test the image quality in different situations. Contrast-to-noise ration (CNR) was used to quantitatively describe the visibility of the target in the image. CNR can be obtained by statistical calculation from image processing and physics analysis with ion chamber measurement. The difference is described by contrast detection efficiency (CDE). By comparing the ratio (R) of CNR with and without the MV beam on, the MV beam scatter was found to have dramatically reduced the target visibility in the kV images (R=0.47), which was supported by an independent physics analysis that treats beam scatter as a noise. In contrast, the kV scatter effect on the MV images was minor (R=0.93). The effect of tumor motion was visible but tolerable for the target tracking purpose. CNR varied with different tumor sites and was lower for the pelvis than the thorax. Different kV imaging parameters such as kVp, mAs, and exposure time ms were tested for different cases. Considering a threshold of 1.0 CNR as a measure for the target visibility, a range of CNR from 1.3 to 4.2 was reached with appropriate tuning of those imaging parameters. This study has shown that CNR is a key parameter that can be used for assessing the visibility of the target in digital imaging and the quality of kV/MV images. It has also been shown that reasonable target visibility can be obtained using simultaneous kV-MV imaging for real-time target tracking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175109     DOI: 10.1118/1.3002313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the image quality of cone beam CT acquired during rotational delivery.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; K Maria Midunvaleja; D Gowtham Raj; Arpita Agarwal; J Velmurugan; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Metal artifact correction for x-ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Andreas Keil; Dragos Constantin; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical development of a failure detection-based online repositioning strategy for prostate IMRT--experiments, simulation, and dosimetry study.

Authors:  Wu Liu; Jianguo Qian; Steven L Hancock; Lei Xing; Gary Luxton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Decompose kV projection using neural network for improved motion tracking in paraspinal SBRT.

Authors:  Xiuxiu He; Weixing Cai; Feifei Li; Qiyong Fan; Pengpeng Zhang; John J Cuaron; Laura I Cerviño; Xiang Li; Tianfang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Clinical Study of Orthogonal-View Phase-Matched Digital Tomosynthesis for Lung Tumor Localization.

Authors:  You Zhang; Lei Ren; Irina Vergalasova; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Fiducial markers visibility and artefacts in prostate cancer radiotherapy multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Sarah O S Osman; Emily Russell; Raymond B King; Karen Crowther; Suneil Jain; Cormac McGrath; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise; Conor K McGarry
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Quantification and correction of the scattered X-rays from a megavoltage photon beam to a linac-mounted kilovoltage imaging subsystem.

Authors:  Hiraku Iramina; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Tomohiro Ono; Hideaki Hirashima; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Clinical Assessment of a Novel Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator-Mounted Helical Fan-Beam kVCT System.

Authors:  Christian Velten; Lee Goddard; Kyoungkeun Jeong; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01

9.  Evaluation of a proprietary software application for motion monitoring during stereotactic paraspinal treatment.

Authors:  Qiyong Fan; Hai Pham; Pengpeng Zhang; Xiang Li; Tianfang Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.243

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.