Literature DB >> 34655442

Decompose kV projection using neural network for improved motion tracking in paraspinal SBRT.

Xiuxiu He1, Weixing Cai1, Feifei Li1, Qiyong Fan1, Pengpeng Zhang1, John J Cuaron2, Laura I Cerviño1, Xiang Li1, Tianfang Li1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: On-treatment kV images have been used in tracking patient motion. One challenge of markerless motion tracking in paraspinal SBRT is the reduced contrast when the X-ray beam needs to pass through a large portion of the patient's body, for example, from the lateral direction. Besides, due to the spine's overlapping with the surrounding moving organs in the X-ray images, auto-registration could lead to potential errors. This work aims to automatically extract the spine component from the conventional 2D X-ray images, to achieve more robust and more accurate motion management.
METHODS: A ResNet generative adversarial network (ResNetGAN) consisting of one generator and one discriminator was developed to learn the mapping between 2D kV image and the reference spine digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). A tailored multi-channel multi-domain loss function was used to improve the quality of the decomposed spine image. The trained model took a 2D kV image as input and learned to generate the spine component of the X-ray image. The training dataset included 1347 2D kV thoracic and lumbar region X-ray images from 20 randomly selected patients, and the corresponding matched reference spine DRR. Another 226 2D kV images from the remaining four patients were used for evaluation. The resulted decomposed spine images and the original X-ray images were registered to the reference spine DRRs, to compare the spine tracking accuracy.
RESULTS: The decomposed spine image had the mean peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) of 60.08 and 0.99, respectively, indicating the model retained and enhanced the spine structure information in the original 2D X-ray image. The decomposed spine image matching with the reference spine DRR had submillimeter accuracy (in mm) with a mean error of 0.13, 0.12, and a maximum of 0.58, 0.49 in the x - and y -directions (in the imager coordinates), respectively. The accuracy improvement is robust in all lateral and anteroposterior X-ray beam angles.
CONCLUSION: We developed a deep learning-based approach to remove soft tissues in the kV image, leading to more accurate spine tracking in paraspinal SBRT.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X ray; image-guided therapy; radiation therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34655442      PMCID: PMC9454326          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  31 in total

1.  Improved quality of intrafraction kilovoltage images by triggered readout of unexposed frames.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Johnny Jonassen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Carsten Jensen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analysis of image quality for real-time target tracking using simultaneous kV-MV imaging.

Authors:  W Luo; S Yoo; Q J Wu; Z Wang; F-F Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Frequency of Large Intrafractional Target Motions During Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Wu; Josephine Wu; Åse Ballangrud; Jim Mechalakos; Josh Yamada; D Michael Lovelock
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22

5.  Real-time segmentation of multiple implanted cylindrical liver markers in kilovoltage and megavoltage x-ray images.

Authors:  W Fledelius; E Worm; M Høyer; C Grau; P R Poulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Spinal metastases: From conventional fractionated radiotherapy to single-dose SBRT.

Authors:  Carlo Greco; Oriol Pares; Nuno Pimentel; Elizabeth Moser; Vasco Louro; Xavier Morales; Barbara Salas; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-04-18

7.  A novel markerless technique to evaluate daily lung tumor motion based on conventional cone-beam CT projection data.

Authors:  Yin Yang; Zichun Zhong; Xiaohu Guo; Jing Wang; John Anderson; Timothy Solberg; Weihua Mao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The accuracy and precision of Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) six degree-of-freedom prostate motion measurements during patient treatments.

Authors:  Jung-Ha Kim; Doan T Nguyen; Jeremy T Booth; Chen-Yu Huang; Todsaporn Fuangrod; Per Poulsen; Ricky O'Brien; Vincent Caillet; Thomas Eade; Andrew Kneebone; Paul Keall
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Technical Note: Synthetic treatment beam imaging for motion monitoring during spine SBRT treatments - a phantom study.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Feifei Li; Weixing Cai; Pengpeng Zhang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  An integrated multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases: an International Spine Oncology Consortium report.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Whitney H Beeler; Fabio Y de Moraes; Laurence D Rhines; Joseph J Gemmete; Neeraj Chaudhary; David B Shultz; Sean R Smith; Alejandro Berlin; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Kelly C Younge; Mark Bilsky; Paul Park; Nicholas J Szerlip
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.