Literature DB >> 19132413

Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty.

Arup K Bhadra1, A S Raman, Adrian T H Casey, R J Crawford.   

Abstract

Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were--(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P=0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average 2,920 pound sterling) with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19132413      PMCID: PMC2899334          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; T B Ducker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft.

Authors:  Michael G Kaiser; Regis W Haid; Brian R Subach; Bryan Barnes; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Cadaveric fibula, locking plate, and allogeneic bone matrix for anterior cervical fusions after cervical discectomy for radiculopathy or myelopathy.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Connolly; J Donnaldson; T Abel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Outcome in Cloward anterior fusion for degenerative cervical spinal disease.

Authors:  V Heidecke; N G Rainov; T Marx; W Burkert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Clarence Leung; Adrian Th Casey; Jan Goffin; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Der-Yang Cho; Wen-Rei Liau; Wen-Yen Lee; Jung-Tung Liu; Chung-Lian Chiu; Pon-Chun Sheu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jeff S Silber; D Greg Anderson; Scott D Daffner; Brian T Brislin; J Martin Leland; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques.

Authors:  S E Emery; M J Bolesta; M A Banks; P K Jones
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee; Bryan W Cunningham; John Devine; Eric Williams; Janet Yu-Yahiro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sophie Campana; Sylvain Persohn; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

4.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Driving reaction time before and after anterior cervical fusion for disc herniation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ricarda Lechner; Martin Thaler; Martin Krismer; Christian Haid; Jochen Obernauer; Alois Obwegeser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact of old age on patient-report outcomes and cost utility for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Scott L Parker; J Alex Sielatycki; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Harrison F Kay; Joseph B Wick; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of outcomes and safety of using hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft in cervical cages for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hosein Mashhadinezhad; Fariborz Samini; Reza Zare
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

9.  Use of autologous bone graft in anterior cervical decompression: morbidity & quality of life analysis.

Authors:  Helen M Heneghan; John P McCabe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Treatment results in the differential surgery of intradural extramedullary schwannoma of 110 cases.

Authors:  Shaohui Zong; Gaofeng Zeng; Chunxiang Xiong; Bo Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.