Literature DB >> 11844257

Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft.

Michael G Kaiser1, Regis W Haid, Brian R Subach, Bryan Barnes, Gerald E Rodts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anterior plate fixation has gained widespread acceptance for the treatment of cervical spondylosis, theoretically enhancing the rate of arthrodesis. There are few studies comparing fusion rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without a plate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anterior cervical plating for fusion enhancement after one- and two-level ACDF with cortical allograft.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed with 251 patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF with cortical allograft and plate stabilization between 1993 and 1999. An independent surgeon reviewer determined fusion status and complications. A successful fusion was defined by the absence of lucency around the graft, evidence of bridging bone between the endplate and the graft, and the absence of movement on dynamic imaging scans. Follow-up data, ranging from 9 months to 3.6 years, were available for 233 patients. A control group of 289 patients who underwent ACDF without plating was described in a previously published report by the senior author (RWH). Therefore, a total of 540 patients were evaluated for determination of the efficacy of anterior cervical plating with cortical allograft bone. Statistical significance was determined by chi(2) test.
RESULTS: The fusion rates for one- and two-level ACDF with anterior fixation were 96 and 91%, respectively, compared with 90 and 72% for one- and two-level ACDF without anterior fixation. The observed increases in fusion rates for both one- and two-level procedures proved to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no recorded infectious, neurological, or graft-related complications among the cohort treated with anterior cervical plating. Compared with the results for the cohort treated without anterior cervical plates, there was a statistically significant decrease in the graft-related complication rate with the application of plates (P < 0.001). Two patients who received plates were noted to have adjacent-segment degenerative changes that required surgical intervention. No hardware fractures were noted; however, one patient was noted to have a single displaced screw, without clinical consequences.
CONCLUSION: The use of anterior cervical plating after one- and two-level ACDF with allograft cortical bone significantly enhanced arthrodesis. The improved fusion rate and negligible complication rate associated with anterior cervical plating are compelling factors justifying its use in the treatment of cervical spondylosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844257     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200202000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  92 in total

1.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study Evaluating an Integrated Screw and Interbody Spacer for One- and Two-Level ACDF.

Authors:  Paul D Lane; Jacob L Cox; Roger B Gaskins; Brandon G Santoni; James B Billys; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Maintenance of graft compression in the adult cervical spine.

Authors:  Ciaran Bolger; Maurice Bourlion; Xavier Leroy; Dominique Petit; Gerard Vanacker; Linda McEvoy; Jabir Nagaria
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Jesse T Lim; Sung-Min Kim; Josemaria Paterno; Rafer Willenberg; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Load sharing mechanism across graft-bone interface in static cervical locking plate fixation.

Authors:  In Ho Han; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Byung Ho Jin; Yong Eun Cho; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-04-30

6.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  ACDF Using the Solis Cage with Iliac Bone Graft in Single Level: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Average 36 months Follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Hyuck Oh; Kyeong-Wook Yoon; Young-Jin Kim; Sang-Koo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

8.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Zero-Profile Spacer and Anterior Plate in Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Teng Lu; Baobao Liang; Junkui Xu; Jun Zhou; Hongjun Lv; Jie Qin; Xuan Cai; Sihua Huang; Haopeng Li; Dong Wang; Xijing He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.