Literature DB >> 12445338

Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease.

Der-Yang Cho1, Wen-Rei Liau, Wen-Yen Lee, Jung-Tung Liu, Chung-Lian Chiu, Pon-Chun Sheu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effectiveness of a new material, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), in a spinal cage used in performing cervical spinal fusion for the correction of cervical kyphosis.
METHODS: A total of 80 patients with various cervical diseases were divided into two groups. Patients in Group A (40 patients) underwent microdiscectomy and PEEK cage fusion, and patients in Group B (40 patients) were treated with microdisectomy and autogenous iliac crest graft (AICG) fusion. We evaluated the patients for cervical lordosis, the height of the foramina, the cross sectional area of the foramina, and fusion status on the basis of x-rays. The patients' neurological and functional outcomes were assessed on the basis of the Prolo scale. Magnetic resonance imaging was also performed for spinal cord evaluation.
RESULTS: The use of the PEEK cage in patients who undergo spinal fusion may increase cervical lordosis (mean, 2.33 +/- 3.00 mm; P = 0.03), whereas AICG fusion may not (mean, -0.84 +/- 6.69 mm; P = 0.49). The use of the PEEK cage was found to increase the height of the foramina (mean, 2.54 +/- 1.40 mm; P = 0.00) and increase its cross sectional area (mean, 40.36 +/- 23.53 mm2; P = 0.00). The height of the foramina increased only in the PEEK group postoperatively. The cross sectional area of the foramina increased in both groups postoperatively. The complication rate in patients who underwent fusion procedures with the PEEK cage was less than that in patients who underwent fusion with AICG fusion (2.50 versus 17.50%; P = 0.03). Both groups had a satisfactory fusion rate (100 versus 93.1%). The patients' postoperative Prolo scale scores were statistically better in the PEEK group (8.50 +/- 1.49 versus 7.17 +/- 2.13; P = 0.00), and more patients in the PEEK group than in the AICG group achieved excellent outcomes (66.63 versus 28.57%; P = 0.00). Because PEEK is radiotransparent on x-rays and few artifacts are seen on magnetic resonance imaging scans, it is better suited than autogenous iliac crest donor material for postoperative radiographic evaluation.
CONCLUSION: The PEEK cage provides solid fusion, increased cervical lordosis, and increased height and cross sectional area of the foramina. There are few complications associated with the use of this cage, and the functional and neurological outcomes are satisfactory. It also facilitates postoperative x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The PEEK cage is therefore a good substitute for AICG fusion in patients with cervical disc disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12445338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  55 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages.

Authors:  P I J M Wuisman; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  ACDF Using the Solis Cage with Iliac Bone Graft in Single Level: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Average 36 months Follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Hyuck Oh; Kyeong-Wook Yoon; Young-Jin Kim; Sang-Koo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

3.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Wu; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Yu Liang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kwang-Bok Lee; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Efficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Song; Gyu Hyung Kim; Byeong Yeol Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

7.  Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Sun-Jung Yoon; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage).

Authors:  Bjarne Lied; Paal Andre Roenning; Jarle Sundseth; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  New cervical laminoplasty polyethererketone cage - two case reports -.

Authors:  Jae-Yoon Chung; Jae-Joon Lee; Jong-Seon Kim; Hyoung-Yeon Seo
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2007-06-30

Review 10.  Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.

Authors:  Ioannis Nikolaidis; Ioannis P Fouyas; Peter Ag Sandercock; Patrick F Statham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.