Literature DB >> 25207311

Comparison of outcomes and safety of using hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft in cervical cages for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion.

Hosein Mashhadinezhad1, Fariborz Samini1, Reza Zare1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After cervical discectomy, autogenic bone is packed into the cage to increase the rate of union between adjacent vertebral bodies, but donor site-related complications can still occur. In this study we evaluate the use of hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft for interbody fusion.
METHODS: From November 2008 to November 2011, 236 patients participated in this study. Peek cages were packed with autologous bone grafts taken from the iliac crest in 112 patients and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules in 124 patients. Patients were followed for 12 months. The patients' neurological signs, results, and complications were fully recorded throughout the procedure. Radiological imaging was done to assess the fusion rate and settling ratio.
RESULTS: Formation of bony bridges at the third month was higher in the autograft group versus the granule group. However, there was no difference between both groups at the 12-month follow-up assessment. No difference (P> 0.05) was found regarding improvement in neurological deficit as well as radicular pain and recovery rate between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Interbody fusion cage containing HA granules proved to be an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Clinical and neurological outcome, radiographic measurement and fusion rate in cage containing HA are similar and competitive with autograft packed cages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autograft; Cage; Hydroxyapatite granules; Interbody fusion; Settling ratio

Year:  2014        PMID: 25207311      PMCID: PMC4151434     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Nonautologous interbody fusion materials in cervical spine surgery: how strong is the evidence to justify their use?

Authors:  C C Wigfield; R J Nelson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Anterior cervical fusion by the smith-robinson approach.

Authors:  N Aronson; D L Filtzer; M Bagan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Hydroxyapatite ceramics in multilevel cervical interbody fusion - is there a role?

Authors:  Miroslav Vukić; Beverly C Walters; Ankica Radić; Ivana Jurjević; Sergej M Marasanov; Marjan Rozanković; Hrvoje Jednacak
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Morbidity after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The influence of the donor site on recovery, and the results of a trial of surgibone compared to autologous bone.

Authors:  J N Rawlinson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Der-Yang Cho; Wuen-Yen Lee; Pon-Chun Sheu; Chun-Chung Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-06

7.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage.

Authors:  R J Hacker; J C Cauthen; T J Gilbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Vertebral autograft used as bone transplant for anterior cervical corpectomy: technical note.

Authors:  Andreas Rieger; Carsten Holz; Thomas Marx; Lhagva Sanchin; Matthias Menzel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Daniel Murrey; Michael Janssen; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey Goldstein; Jack Zigler; Bobby Tay; Bruce Darden
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Clinical Application of Ceramics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Shayan Abdollah Zadegan; Aidin Abedi; Seyed Behnam Jazayeri; Hirbod Nasiri Bonaki; Alexander R Vaccaro; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  A new bioinspired collagen-hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute in adult scoliosis surgery: results at 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Giorgi; Dario Capitani; Simone Sprio; Monica Sandri; Anna Tampieri; Valentina Canella; Angelo Nataloni; Giuseppe R Schirò
Journal:  J Appl Biomater Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.604

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.