Literature DB >> 12544929

Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Jeff S Silber1, D Greg Anderson, Scott D Daffner, Brian T Brislin, J Martin Leland, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective, questionnaire-based investigation evaluated iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) site morbidity in patients having undergone a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure performed by a single surgeon (T.J.A.).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate acute and chronic problems associated with anterior ICBG donation, particularly long-term functional outcomes and impairments caused by graft donation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures frequently use autologous anterior ICBG to facilitate osseous union. Although autologous ICBG offers several advantages over alternative grafting materials, donor site morbidity can be significant. Acute and chronic complications of donor sites have been reported, yet there are currently no reports of long-term functional outcomes after autologous anterior ICBG donation after single-level ACDF.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 187 consecutive patients who were retrospectively identified to have undergone autologous anterior ICBG harvest for single-level ACDF between 1994 and 1998. The questionnaire divided items into symptomatic (acute and chronic) and functional assessments. Patients answered yes, no, or not applicable; pain was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Surveys were completed either by mail or follow-up telephone interview by 134 patients (71.6%). Average follow-up was 48 months (range, 24-72 months). Acute symptoms were reported at the following rates: ambulation difficulty, 50.7%; extended antibiotic usage, 7.5%; persistent drainage, 3.7%; wound dehiscence, 2.2%; and incision and drainage, 1.5%. The chronic symptom questionnaire demonstrated a high degree of satisfaction with the cosmetic result (92.5%). Pain at the donor site was reported by 26.1% of patients with a mean VAS score of 3.8 in 10, and 11.2% chronically use pain medication. Twenty-one patients (15.7%) reported abnormal sensations at the donor site, but only 5.2% reported discomfort with clothing. A unique functional assessment revealed current impairments at the following rates: ambulation, 12.7%; recreational activities, 11.9%; work activities, 9.7%; activities of daily living, 8.2%; sexual activity, 7.5%; and household chores, 6.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of patients report chronic donor site pain after anterior ICBG donation, even when only a single-level ACDF procedure is performed. Moreover, long-term functional impairment can also be significant. Patients should be counseled regarding these potential problems, and alternative sources of graft material should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544929     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  214 in total

1.  Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Stavroula Pagkrati; Danilo Leonetti; Maria Teresa Miscione; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The role of NELL-1, a growth factor associated with craniosynostosis, in promoting bone regeneration.

Authors:  X Zhang; J Zara; R K Siu; K Ting; C Soo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  A new source of structural autograft for ACDF surgery: cervical laminae.

Authors:  Jiaming Liu; Xu Xiong; Xinhua Long; Yong Shu; Shanhu Huang; Dong Yang; Zhili Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

4.  In vivo engineering of organs: the bone bioreactor.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Robert P Marini; Dirk Schaefer; Joshua Aronson; Robert Langer; V Prasad Shastri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Jesse T Lim; Sung-Min Kim; Josemaria Paterno; Rafer Willenberg; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  A comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrix for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; A Alanay; Davies Mark; Linda E A Kanim; Pat A Campbell; Edgar G Dawson; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of Two Synthetic Bone Graft Products in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model.

Authors:  Douglas Fredericks; Emily B Petersen; Nicole Watson; Nicole Grosland; Katherine Gibson-Corley; Joseph Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

9.  Putting Electrospun Nanofibers to Work for Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Jingwei Xie; Xiaoran Li; Younan Xia
Journal:  Macromol Rapid Commun       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.734

10.  Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques.

Authors:  Raymond Pollock; Ilhan Alcelik; Chandra Bhatia; Graham Chuter; Kiran Lingutla; Chakravarty Budithi; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.