I Noordhoek1, M T Koning2, C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. i.noordhoek@lumc.nl. 2. Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven effective in treating radicular arm pain. Post-operatively, cervical spine stability is temporarily challenged, but data on bony fusion and speed of fusion are ambiguous; optimum evaluation method and criteria are debated. AIM: To study bony fusion accomplishment and to obtain an overview of methods to evaluate fusion. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase. Included studies had to report original data concerning 1- or 2-level ACDF with intervertebral device or bone graft, where bony fusion was assessed using CT scans or X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 146 articles comprising 10,208 patients were included. Bony fusion was generally defined as "the presence of trabecular bridging" and/or "the absence of motion". Fusion was accomplished in 90.1% of patients at the final follow-up. No gold standard for assessment could be derived from the results. Addition of plates and/or cages with screws resulted in slightly higher accomplishment of fusion, but differences were not clinically relevant. Eighteen studies correlated clinical outcome with bony fusion, and 3 found a significant correlation between accomplishment and better clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In approximately 90% of patients, bony fusion is accomplished one year after ACDF. As there is no generally accepted definition of bony fusion, different measuring techniques cannot be compared to a gold standard and it is impossible to determine the most accurate method. Variations in study design hamper conclusions on optimising the rate of bony fusion by choice of material and/or additives. Insufficient attention is paid to correlation between bony fusion and clinical outcome. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.
PURPOSE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven effective in treating radicular arm pain. Post-operatively, cervical spine stability is temporarily challenged, but data on bony fusion and speed of fusion are ambiguous; optimum evaluation method and criteria are debated. AIM: To study bony fusion accomplishment and to obtain an overview of methods to evaluate fusion. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase. Included studies had to report original data concerning 1- or 2-level ACDF with intervertebral device or bone graft, where bony fusion was assessed using CT scans or X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 146 articles comprising 10,208 patients were included. Bony fusion was generally defined as "the presence of trabecular bridging" and/or "the absence of motion". Fusion was accomplished in 90.1% of patients at the final follow-up. No gold standard for assessment could be derived from the results. Addition of plates and/or cages with screws resulted in slightly higher accomplishment of fusion, but differences were not clinically relevant. Eighteen studies correlated clinical outcome with bony fusion, and 3 found a significant correlation between accomplishment and better clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In approximately 90% of patients, bony fusion is accomplished one year after ACDF. As there is no generally accepted definition of bony fusion, different measuring techniques cannot be compared to a gold standard and it is impossible to determine the most accurate method. Variations in study design hamper conclusions on optimising the rate of bony fusion by choice of material and/or additives. Insufficient attention is paid to correlation between bony fusion and clinical outcome. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Clinical outcome; Radiologic techniques; Speed of fusion
Authors: David S Baskin; Patrick Ryan; Volker Sonntag; Richard Westmark; Marsha A Widmayer Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Hamed Yazdanshenas; Ethan Osias; Richard Hwang; Don Y Park; Elizabeth Lord; Arya N Shamie Journal: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Date: 2022-03-09
Authors: Valérie N E Schuermans; Anouk Y J M Smeets; Nienke P M H Wijsen; Inez Curfs; Toon F M Boselie; Henk van Santbrink Journal: Brain Spine Date: 2022-01-22