Literature DB >> 19110047

Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners.

Bernhard Ross1, Kelly Tremblay.   

Abstract

Experiencing repeatedly presented auditory stimuli during magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recording may affect how the sound is processed in the listener's brain and may modify auditory evoked responses over the time course of the experiment. Amplitudes of N1 and P2 responses have been proposed as indicators for the outcome of training and learning studies. In this context the effect of merely sound experience on N1 and P2 responses was studied during two experimental sessions on different days with young, middle-aged, and older participants passively listening to speech stimuli and a noise sound. N1 and P2 were characterized as functionally distinct responses with P2 sources located more anterior than N1 in auditory cortices. N1 amplitudes decreased continuously during each recording session, but completely recovered between sessions. In contrast, P2 amplitudes were fairly constant within a session but increased from the first to the second day of MEG recording. Whereas N1 decrease was independent of age, the amount of P2 amplitude increase diminished with age. Temporal dynamics of N1 and P2 amplitudes were interpreted as reflecting neuroplastic changes along different time scales. The long lasting increase in P2 amplitude indicates that the auditory P2 response is potentially an important physiological correlate of perceptual learning, memory, and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19110047      PMCID: PMC2668103          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  60 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Stability of mismatch negativities in children.

Authors:  R Uwer; W von Suchodoletz
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians.

Authors:  C Pantev; L E Roberts; M Schulz; A Engelien; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Representational cortex in musicians. Plastic alterations in response to musical practice.

Authors:  C Pantev; A Engelien; V Candia; T Elbert
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  The role of sleep in learning and memory.

Authors:  P Maquet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients.

Authors:  B Godey; D Schwartz; J B de Graaf; P Chauvel; C Liégeois-Chauvel
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  R Näätänen; M Tervaniemi; E Sussman; P Paavilainen; I Winkler
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  B Ross; C Borgmann; R Draganova; L E Roberts; C Pantev
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices.

Authors:  A Engelien; M Schulz; B Ross; V Arolt; C Pantev
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  41 in total

1.  Electrophysiological assessment of auditory stimulus-specific plasticity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan P Mears; Kevin M Spencer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Pitch discrimination learning: specificity for pitch and harmonic resolvability, and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-12

Review 4.  The Ear-Brain Connection: Older Ears and Older Brains.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  ERP correlates of pitch error detection in complex tone and voice auditory feedback with missing fundamental.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Repeated stimulus exposure alters the way sound is encoded in the human brain.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kayo Inoue; Katrina McClannahan; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Action planning and predictive coding when speaking.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Daniel H Mathalon; Brian J Roach; James Reilly; Sarah K Keedy; John A Sweeney; Judith M Ford
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.