Literature DB >> 11201080

Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians.

C Pantev1, L E Roberts, M Schulz, A Engelien, B Ross.   

Abstract

Neural imaging studies have shown that the brains of skilled musicians respond differently to musical stimuli than do the brains of non-musicians, particularly for musicians who commenced practice at an early age. Whether brain attributes related to musical skill are attributable to musical practice or are hereditary traits that influence the decision to train musically is a subject of controversy, owing to its pedagogic implications. Here we report that auditory cortical representations measured neuromagnetically for tones of different timbre (violin and trumpet) are enhanced compared to sine tones in violinists and trumpeters, preferentially for timbres of the instrument of training. Timbre specificity is predicted by a principle of use-dependent plasticity and imposes new requirements on nativistic accounts of brain attributes associated with musical skill.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11201080     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200101220-00041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  97 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The "silent" imprint of musical training.

Authors:  Carina Klein; Franziskus Liem; Jürgen Hänggi; Stefan Elmer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Authors:  Mari Tervaniemi; Viola Just; Stefan Koelsch; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perception of phrase structure in music.

Authors:  Thomas R Knösche; Christiane Neuhaus; Jens Haueisen; Kai Alter; Burkhard Maess; Otto W Witte; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  PLASTICITY IN THE ADULT CENTRAL AUDITORY SYSTEM.

Authors:  Dexter R F Irvine; James B Fallon; Marc R Kamke
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Selective neurophysiologic responses to music in instrumentalists with different listening biographies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis; Lauren M Mlsna; Ajith K Uppunda; Todd B Parrish; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Differential adaptation of descending motor tracts in musicians.

Authors:  Theodor Rüber; Robert Lindenberg; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Pitch-interval discrimination and musical expertise: is the semitone a perceptual boundary?

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Caroline R Ritson; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.