Literature DB >> 22386045

ERP correlates of pitch error detection in complex tone and voice auditory feedback with missing fundamental.

Roozbeh Behroozmand1, Oleg Korzyukov, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the pitch of a sound is perceived in the absence of its fundamental frequency (F0), suggesting that a distinct mechanism may resolve pitch based on a pattern that exists between harmonic frequencies. The present study investigated whether such a mechanism is active during voice pitch control. ERPs were recorded in response to +200 cents pitch shifts in the auditory feedback of self-vocalizations and complex tones with and without the F0. The absence of the fundamental induced no difference in ERP latencies. However, a right-hemisphere difference was found in the N1 amplitudes with larger responses to complex tones that included the fundamental compared to when it was missing. The P1 and N1 latencies were shorter in the left hemisphere, and the N1 and P2 amplitudes were larger bilaterally for pitch shifts in voice and complex tones compared with pure tones. These findings suggest hemispheric differences in neural encoding of pitch in sounds with missing fundamental. Data from the present study suggest that the right cortical auditory areas, thought to be specialized for spectral processing, may utilize different mechanisms to resolve pitch in sounds with missing fundamental. The left hemisphere seems to perform faster processing to resolve pitch based on the rate of temporal variations in complex sounds compared with pure tones. These effects indicate that the differential neural processing of pitch in the left and right hemispheres may enable the audio-vocal system to detect temporal and spectral variations in the auditory feedback for vocal pitch control. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386045      PMCID: PMC3309166          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  44 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Auditory response following vocalization: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  A Gunji; M Hoshiyama; R Kakigi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Finding the pitch of the missing fundamental in infants.

Authors:  Chao He; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Brain potentials as objective indexes of auditory pitch extraction from harmonics.

Authors:  R Ragot; R Lepaul-Ercole
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; B Lütkenhöner; K Lehnertz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The neural control of vocalization in mammals: a review.

Authors:  U Jürgens
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  5 in total

1.  The neural changes in connectivity of the voice network during voice pitch perturbation.

Authors:  Sabina G Flagmeier; Kimberly L Ray; Amy L Parkinson; Karl Li; Robert Vargas; Larry R Price; Angela R Laird; Charles R Larson; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Vocal and Neural Responses to Unexpected Changes in Voice Pitch Auditory Feedback During Register Transitions.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Anjli Lodhavia; Saul Frankford; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Pitch Discrimination Testing in Patients with a Voice Disorder.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Antonia M Chacon; Daniel Novakovic; Nicola J Hodges; Paul N Carding; Catherine Madill
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Multivoxel patterns reveal functionally differentiated networks underlying auditory feedback processing of speech.

Authors:  Zane Z Zheng; Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall; Rhodri Cusack; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sensory-motor interactions for vocal pitch monitoring in non-primary human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jeremy D W Greenlee; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson; Adam W Jackson; Fangxiang Chen; Daniel R Hansen; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.