Literature DB >> 10955634

A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

B Ross1, C Borgmann, R Draganova, L E Roberts, C Pantev.   

Abstract

The cerebral magnetic field of the auditory steady-state response (SSR) to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones was recorded in healthy humans. The waveforms of underlying cortical source activity were calculated at multiples of the modulation frequency using the method of source space projection, which improved the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by a factor of 2 to 4. Since the complex amplitudes of the cortical source activity were independent of the sensor position in relation to the subject's head, a comparison of the results across experimental sessions was possible. The effect of modulation frequency on the amplitude and phase of the SSR was investigated at 30 different values between 10 and 98 Hz. At modulation frequencies between 10 and 20 Hz the SNR of harmonics near 40 Hz were predominant over the fundamental SSR. Above 30 Hz the SSR showed an almost sinusoidal waveform with an amplitude maximum at 40 Hz. The amplitude decreased with increasing modulation frequency but was significantly different from the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) background activity up to 98 Hz. Phase response at the fundamental and first harmonic decreased monotonically with increasing modulation frequency. The group delay (apparent latency) showed peaks of 72 ms at 20 Hz, 48 ms at 40 Hz, and 26 ms at 80 Hz. The effects of stimulus intensity, modulation depth, and carrier frequency on amplitude and phase of the SSR were also investigated. The SSR amplitude decreased linearly when stimulus intensity or the modulation depth were decreased in logarithmic steps. SSR amplitude decreased by a factor of 3 when carrier frequency increased from 250 to 4000 Hz. From the phase characteristics, time delays were found in the range of 0 to 6 ms for stimulus intensity, modulation depth, and carrier frequency, which were maximal at low frequencies, low intensities, or maximal modulation depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10955634     DOI: 10.1121/1.429600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  72 in total

1.  Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Yadong Wang; Nai Ding; Nayef Ahmar; Juanjuan Xiang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS.

Authors:  Maria A Pastor; Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical gamma generators suggest abnormal auditory circuitry in early-onset psychosis.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Olivia O Hernandez; Ryan M Asherin; Peter D Teale; Martin L Reite; Donald C Rojas
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The modulatory influence of a predictive cue on the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Françoise Lecaignard; Nadia Müller; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Richard A Reale; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Christopher K Kovach; Haiming Chen; Matthew A Howard; John F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm.

Authors:  Nadia Müller; Winfried Schlee; Thomas Hartmann; Isabel Lorenz; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Neural mechanisms of intermodal sustained selective attention with concurrently presented auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Katja Saupe; Erich Schröger; Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.