Literature DB >> 19101820

Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models.

Joel A Garcia1, Babak Movassaghi, Ivan P Casserly, Andrew J Klein, S-Y James Chen, John C Messenger, Adam Hansgen, Onno Wink, Bertron M Groves, John D Carroll.   

Abstract

Current expert-recommended views for coronary angiography are based on heuristic experience and have not been scientifically studied. We sought to identify optimal viewing regions for first and second order vessel segments of the coronary arteries that provide optimal diagnostic value in terms of minimizing vessel foreshortening and overlap. Using orthogonal 2D images of the coronary tree, 3D models were created from which patient-specific optimal view maps (OVM) allowing quantitative assessment of vessel foreshortening and overlap were generated. Using a novel methodology that averages 3D-based optimal projection geometries, a universal OVM was created for each individual coronary vessel segment that minimized both vessel foreshortening and overlap. A universal OVM model for each coronary segment was generated based on data from 137 patients undergoing coronary angiography. We identified viewing regions for each vessel segment achieving a mean vessel foreshortening value of 5.8 +/- 3.9% for the left coronary artery (LCA) and 5.6 +/- 3.6% for the right coronary artery (RCA). The overall mean overlap values achieved were 8.7 +/- 7.9% for the LCA and 4.6 +/- 3.2% for the RCA. This scientifically-based OVM evaluation of coronary vessel segments provides the means to facilitate acquisitions during coronary angiography and interventions that minimize imaging inaccuracies related to foreshortening and overlap, improving the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101820     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-008-9402-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  10 in total

1.  3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.

Authors:  S J Chen; J D Carroll
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A quantitative analysis of 3-D coronary modeling from two or more projection images.

Authors:  B Movassaghi; V Rasche; M Grass; M A Viergever; W J Niessen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Rotational angiography (RA) and three-dimensional imaging (3-DRA): an available clinical tool.

Authors:  Joel A Garcia; James Chen; Adam Hansgen; Onno Wink; Babak Movassaghi; John C Messenger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Reconstructing the 3-D medial axes of coronary arteries in single-view cineangiograms.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J Sklansky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Angiographic methods to assess human coronary angiogenesis.

Authors:  C M Gibson; K Ryan; A Sparano; J L Moynihan; M Rizzo; M Kelley; S J Marble; R Laham; M Simons; T R McClusky; J T Dodge
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.

Authors:  J C Messenger; S Y Chen; J D Carroll; J E Burchenal; K Kioussopoulos; B M Groves
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-12

7.  Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices.

Authors:  S Y James Chen; John D Carroll; John C Messenger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory.

Authors:  Joel A Garcia; S-Y James Chen; John C Messenger; Ivan P Casserly; Adam Hansgen; Onno Wink; Babak Movassaghi; Andrew J Klein; John D Carroll
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.

Authors:  Nathan E Green; S-Y James Chen; Adam R Hansgen; John C Messenger; Bertron M Groves; John D Carroll
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Determination of 3D imaging geometry and object configurations from two biplane views: an enhancement of the Metz-Fencil technique.

Authors:  K R Hoffmann; C E Metz; Y Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.

Authors:  Michael T Tomkowiak; Michael A Speidel; Amish N Raval; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimized viewing angles for cardiac electrophysiology ablation procedures.

Authors:  Martin Koch; Matthias Hoffmann; Marcus Pfister; Joachim Hornegger; Norbert Strobel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rios; Rohit S Loomba; Susan R Foerster; Andrew N Pelech; Todd M Gudausky
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography: a new technique for detecting graft coronary vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Todd M Gudausky; Andrew N Pelech; Gail Stendahl; Kathryn Tillman; Judy Mattice; Stuart Berger; Steven Zangwill
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Optimization of acquisition trajectories for 3D rotational coronary venography.

Authors:  Jingying Bi; Michael Grass; Dirk Schäfer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Cardiovascular imaging 2010 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan de Sutter; Nico R L van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.