Literature DB >> 26846123

Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Rodrigo Rios1, Rohit S Loomba2, Susan R Foerster2, Andrew N Pelech3, Todd M Gudausky2.   

Abstract

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the leading cause of graft failure in pediatric heart transplant recipients, also adding to mortality in this patient population. Coronary angiography is routinely performed to screen for CAV, with conventional single-plane or bi-plane angiography being utilized. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA) has been described, mostly in the adult population, and may offer reduction in radiation dose and contrast volume. Experience with this in the pediatric population is limited. This study describes a single-institution experience with RA for screening for CAV in pediatric patients. The catheterization database at our institution was used to identify pediatric heart transplant recipients having undergone RA to screen for CAV. Procedural data including radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure time were collected for each catheterization. The number of instances in which RA was not successful, ECG changes were present, and CAV was detected were also collected for each catheterization. A total of 97 patients underwent 345 catheterizations utilizing RA. Median radiation dose-area product per kilogram was found to be 341.7 (mGy cm(2)/kg), total air kerma was 126.8 (mGy), procedure time was 69 min, fluoroscopy time was 9.9 min, and contrast volume was 13 ml. A total of 17 (2 %) coronary artery injections out of 690 could not be successfully imaged using RA. A total of 14 patients had CAV noted at any point, 10 of whom had progressive CAV. Electrocardiographic changes were documented in a total of 10 (3 %) RA catheterizations. Procedural characteristics did not differ between serial catheterizations. RA is safe and feasible for CAV screening in pediatric heart transplant recipients while offering coronary imaging in multiple planes compared to conventional angiography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Coronary; Rejection; Swing; Transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846123     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1344-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  19 in total

1.  Greater radiation savings at higher body mass indexes with dual axis rotational coronary angiography.

Authors:  Victor Grech; Marvin Grech; Joseph Debono; Robert G Xuereb; Albert Fenech
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Fourteenth Pediatric Heart Transplantation Report--2011.

Authors:  Richard Kirk; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Jason D Christie; Fabienne Dobbels; Axel O Rahmel; Josef Stehlik; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 3.  A novel dual-axis rotational coronary angiography evaluation of coronary artery disease--case presentation and review.

Authors:  Paul A Hudson; Andrew J Klein; Michael S Kim; Onno Wink; Adam Hansgen; Ivan P Casserly; John C Messenger; S Y James Chen; John D Carroll; Joel A Garcia
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: recent developments.

Authors:  Daniel Schmauss; Michael Weis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Rohit S Loomba; Rodrigo Rios; Matthew Buelow; Mamata Eagam; Saurabh Aggarwal; Rohit R Arora
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The chemokine and chemokine receptor profile of infiltrating cells in the wall of arteries with cardiac allograft vasculopathy is indicative of a memory T-helper 1 response.

Authors:  Jorg van Loosdregt; Matthijs F M van Oosterhout; Annette H Bruggink; Dick F van Wichen; Joyce van Kuik; Erica de Koning; Carla C Baan; Nicolaas de Jonge; Frits H J Gmelig-Meyling; Roel A de Weger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.

Authors:  Antonio E Gómez-Menchero; José F Díaz; Carlos Sánchez-González; Rosa Cardenal; Amit B Sanghvi; Jessica Roa-Garrido; José L Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2012-04-01

8.  Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Klaus Empen; Eberhard Kuon; Astrid Hummel; Chris Gebauer; Marcus Dörr; Raik Könemann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Alexander Staudt; Kerstin Weitmann; Thorsten Reffelmann; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Detection and grading of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary vessel wall.

Authors:  Tarique Hussain; Matthew Fenton; Sarah A Peel; Andrea J Wiethoff; Andrew Taylor; Vivek Muthurangu; Reza Razavi; Rene M Botnar; Michael Burch; Gerald F Greil
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography can reduce peak skin dose and scattered dose: a phantom study.

Authors:  Huiliang Liu; Zhigeng Jin; Yunpeng Deng; Limin Jing
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.