Literature DB >> 15744720

Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.

Nathan E Green1, S-Y James Chen, Adam R Hansgen, John C Messenger, Bertron M Groves, John D Carroll.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the severity of vessel foreshortening in standard angiographic views used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary angiography is limited by its two-dimensional (2D) representation of three-dimensional (3D) structures. Vessel foreshortening in angiographic images may cause errors in the assessment of lesions or the selection and placement of stents. To date, no technique has existed to quantify these 2D limitations or the performance of physicians in selecting angiographic views. Stent deployment was performed in 156 vessel segments in 149 patients. Using 3D reconstruction models of each patient's coronary tree, vessel foreshortening was measured in the actual working view used for stent deployment. A computer-generated optimal view was then identified for each vessel segment and compared to the working view. Vessel foreshortening ranged from 0 to 50% in the 156 working views used for stent deployment and varied by coronary artery and by vessel segment within each artery. In general, views of the mid circumflex artery were the most foreshortened and views of the right coronary artery were the least foreshortened. Expert-recommended views frequently resulted in more foreshortening than computer-generated optimal views, which had only 0.5% +/- 1.2% foreshortening with < 2% overlap for the same 156 segments. Optimal views differed from the operator-selected working views by > or = 10 degrees in over 90% of vessels and frequently occurred in entirely different imaging quadrants. Vessel foreshortening occurs frequently in standard angiographic projections during stent deployment. If unrecognized by the operator, vessel foreshortening may result in suboptimal clinical results. Modifications to expert-recommended views using 3D reconstruction may improve visualization and the accuracy of stent deployment. These results highlight the limitations of 2D angiography and support the development of real-time 3D techniques to improve visualization during PCI. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744720     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  16 in total

1.  Measurement of peripheral arterial vasculature in domestic Yorkshire swine by using quantitative vascular angiography.

Authors:  Vanessa C Lopes-Berkas; Michael A Jorgenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Three-dimensional coronary imaging for the ostium of the left anterior descending artery.

Authors:  Kenji Sadamatsu; Shuichiro Sagara; Tohru Yamawaki; Hideki Tashiro
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology in 2011.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Shengxian Tu; Joan C Tuinenburg; Gerhard Koning; Johannes P Janssen; Jouke Dijkstra
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

4.  3-D reconstruction of the coronary artery tree from multiple views of a rotational X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Rui Liao; Duong Luc; Yiyong Sun; Klaus Kirchberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  [Modern angiographic diagnostic techniques in the catheter laboratory].

Authors:  H Rittger; A-M Sinha; J Brachmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Rui Liao's work on patient-specific 3-D model guidance for interventional and hybrid-operating-room applications.

Authors:  Rui Liao
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28

7.  Optimized viewing angles for cardiac electrophysiology ablation procedures.

Authors:  Martin Koch; Matthias Hoffmann; Marcus Pfister; Joachim Hornegger; Norbert Strobel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 8.  Robotic-assisted angioplasty: current status and future possibilities.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Giora Weisz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models.

Authors:  Joel A Garcia; Babak Movassaghi; Ivan P Casserly; Andrew J Klein; S-Y James Chen; John C Messenger; Adam Hansgen; Onno Wink; Bertron M Groves; John D Carroll
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Gerhard Koning; Wouter Jukema; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.