Literature DB >> 19091176

Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis.

Amedeo Chiribiri1, Nuno Bettencourt, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

Cardiac stress magnetic resonance (MR) testing has been developed and optimized in the past decade, reaching a high diagnostic performance. Its efficacy, together with its excellent safety profile and increasing availability, make cardiac stress MR testing one of the diagnostic modalities of choice for detecting ischemia. A noticeable series of studies validated the diagnosis of ischemia with MR compared with coronary angiography and other noninvasive diagnostic techniques and invasive hemodynamic measurements. In addition, first data on the usefulness of cardiac stress MR testing in assessing prognosis has become available. This article reviews the available literature about diagnostic performance of cardiac stress MR testing and its results in the prognostication of cardiac patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19091176     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-009-0009-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  34 in total

1.  Assessment of preoperative cardiac risk with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; Timothy M Morgan; Christina M Neagle; Kerry M Link; Craig A Hamilton; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Marco A Costa; Steven Shoemaker; Hideki Futamatsu; Chris Klassen; Dominick J Angiolillo; Minh Nguyen; Alan Siuciak; Paul Gilmore; Martin M Zenni; Luis Guzman; Theodore A Bass; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Johannes Rieber; Armin Huber; Isabelle Erhard; Silvia Mueller; Michael Schweyer; Andreas Koenig; Thomas M Schiele; Karl Theisen; Uwe Siebert; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maximilian Reiser; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hideki Futamatsu; Norbert Wilke; Chris Klassen; Steven Shoemaker; Dominick J Angiolillo; Alan Siuciak; Kino Morikawa-Futamatsu; Nobuaki Suzuki; Franz von Ziegler; Theodore A Bass; Marco A Costa
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Nagel; H B Lehmkuhl; W Bocksch; C Klein; U Vogel; E Frantz; A Ellmer; S Dreysse; E Fleck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience.

Authors:  T H Giang; D Nanz; R Coulden; M Friedrich; M Graves; N Al-Saadi; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess; J Schwitter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Coronary artery disease: findings with GRE MR imaging and Tc-99m-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile SPECT during simultaneous dobutamine stress.

Authors:  F M Baer; E Voth; P Theissen; C A Schneider; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study.

Authors:  S D Wolff; J Schwitter; R Coulden; M G Friedrich; D A Bluemke; R W Biederman; E T Martin; A J Lansky; F Kashanian; T K F Foo; P E Licato; C R Comeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prediction of cardiac events in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of wall motion score index.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Timothy M Morgan; Sangeeta Mandapaka; William Ntim; J Jeffrey Carr; Craig A Hamilton; John Hoyle; Hollins Clark; Paige Clark; Kerry M Link; Doug Case; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic field threshold for accurate electrocardiography in the MRI environment.

Authors:  Mihaela Jekic; Yu Ding; Roger Dzwonczyk; Patrick Burns; Subha V Raman; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Dose response of the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in MR perfusion imaging of the myocardium using a quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Niedermayer; Steven Sourbron; Maria Prompona; Clemens Cyran; Maximilian Reiser; Armin Huber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Robust Non-Rigid Motion Compensation of Free-Breathing Myocardial Perfusion MRI Data.

Authors:  Cian M Scannell; Adriana D M Villa; Jack Lee; Marcel Breeuwer; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Prognostic value of combined magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement.

Authors:  Rungroj Krittayaphong; Vithaya Chaithiraphan; Adisak Maneesai; Suthipol Udompanturak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Perfusion phantom: An efficient and reproducible method to simulate myocardial first-pass perfusion measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Andreas Schuster; Masaki Ishida; Gilion Hautvast; Niloufar Zarinabad; Geraint Morton; James Otton; Sven Plein; Marcel Breeuwer; Philip Batchelor; Tobias Schaeffter; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.668

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.