Literature DB >> 8090892

Coronary artery disease: findings with GRE MR imaging and Tc-99m-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile SPECT during simultaneous dobutamine stress.

F M Baer1, E Voth, P Theissen, C A Schneider, H Schicha, U Sechtem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared gradient-recalled echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with technetium-99m-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during the same dobutamine stress for the localization of coronary artery stenoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 35 consecutive patients (28 men and seven women, aged 41-79 years) with angiographically documented coronary artery disease, corresponding GRE MR images and SPECT tomograms were acquired at rest and during dobutamine infusion and were evaluated for regional wall motion or perfusion abnormalities.
RESULTS: Images in both examinations could be analyzed in 32 of 35 (91%) patients. Wall motion or perfusion abnormalities were observed in 27 of 32 (84%) GRE MR imaging and in 28 of 32 (87%) SPECT examinations. Sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine GRE MR imaging and dobutamine SPECT for the localization of left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses were 74% and 100% versus 70% and 100% for the combined left circumflex and right coronary artery perfusion territories.
CONCLUSION: GRE MR imaging and SPECT have a high concordance with respect to the detection of a dobutamine-induced ischemic response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090892     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  [Early diagnosis of the functional relevance of coronary heart disease].

Authors:  F M Baer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis.

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Nuno Bettencourt; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Assessment of myocardial viability in a porcine model of chronic coronary artery stenosis with dual dose dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Dymarkowski; M Szilard; A Maes; X S Liu; Y M Huang; E Verbeken; L Mortelmans; J Bogaert; I De Scheerder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady-state, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging.

Authors:  Nico Merkle; Jochen Wöhrle; Olaf Grebe; Thorsten Nusser; Markus Kunze; Hans A Kestler; Matthias Kochs; Vinzenz Hombach
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Nuno Bettencourt; Amedeo Chiribiri; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  Current clinical relevance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and its relationship to nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.