Literature DB >> 23739813

Dose response of the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in MR perfusion imaging of the myocardium using a quantitative evaluation.

Sebastian Niedermayer1, Steven Sourbron, Maria Prompona, Clemens Cyran, Maximilian Reiser, Armin Huber.   

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the best concentration of gadofosveset at 1.5 and 3 T MRI for quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis. 18 healthy volunteers have been examined at a 1.5 and a 3 T MRI system assigned to one of three dose groups: low dose (0.00375 mmol/kg), medium dose (0.0075 mmol/kg), high dose (0.0150 mmol/kg). A T1-weighted saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence with parallel imaging was used. Two perfusion scans were performed for each field strength and volunteer. Peak signal-to-noise-ratio, maximum contrast-enhancement-ratio and myocardial blood flow (MBF) were calculated. MBF values were significantly higher at 1.5 T in the medium and the high dose groups than in the low dose group (p < 0.001). Higher MBF values could be found at 3 T for the second perfusion scan in the medium and both perfusion scans in the high dose group compared to the low dose group. Optimal dose of gadofosveset for quantitative perfusion analysis at 1.5 T is 0.00375 mmol/kg as higher doses caused overestimation of the MBF. At 3 T 0.0075 mmol/kg seems to be the best dose for a single perfusion scan, while for a second perfusion scan MBF may be overestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739813     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0250-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jörg Barkhausen; Peter Hunold; Markus Jochims; Jörg F Debatin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  [Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis].

Authors:  Astrid Breitschaft; Ralf Stahlmann
Journal:  Med Monatsschr Pharm       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Basic principles of MR contrast.

Authors:  K L Nelson; V M Runge
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995

5.  Comparison of intravascular and extracellular contrast media for absolute quantification of myocardial rest-perfusion using high-resolution MRI.

Authors:  Christian O Ritter; Aline Wilke; Tobias Wichmann; Meinrad Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Authors:  Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Estimation of absolute myocardial blood flow during first-pass MR perfusion imaging using a dual-bolus injection technique: comparison to single-bolus injection method.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Optimal imaging strategies to assess coronary blood flow and risk for patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Vicente Bodi; Juan Sanchis; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Julio Nunez; Luis Mainar; Jose V Monmeneu; Oliver Husser; Eloy Dominguez; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber; Subha V Raman; Krishna Nayak; Frederick H Epstein; Pedro Ferreira; Leon Axel; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.