Literature DB >> 15351166

Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience.

T H Giang1, D Nanz, R Coulden, M Friedrich, M Graves, N Al-Saadi, T F Lüscher, G K von Schulthess, J Schwitter.   

Abstract

AIMS: Magnetic resonance (MR) first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging during hyperaemia detects coronary artery stenoses in humans with test sensitivity depending on contrast medium (CM)-induced signal change in myocardium. In this prospective multi-centre study, the effect of CM dose on myocardial signal change and on diagnostic performance was evaluated using a stress-only approach. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were randomised to 0.05,0.10, or 0.15 mmol/kg body weight of an extravascular CM (Gd-DTPA) and X-ray coronary angiography was performed within 30 days prior/after the MR examination. A multi-slice MR technique with identical hardware and software in all centres was used during hyperaemia (adenosine 0.14 mg/kg/min) to monitor myocardial CM wash-in kinetics and data were analysed semi-automatically in a core laboratory. Protocol violations resulted in 80 complete studies with CAD (defined as > or =1 vessel with diameter stenosis > or =50% on quantitative coronary angiography) present in 19/29, 13/24, and 20/27 patients for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In normal myocardium, the upslope increased with CM dose (overall-p<0.0001, ANOVA). For CAD detection the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for subendocardial data (3 slices with quality score<4 representing 86% of cases) was 0.91+/-0.07 and 0.86+/-0.08 for doses 2 and 3, respectively, and was lower for dose 1 (0.53+/-0.13, p<0.01 and p<0.02 vs. doses 2 and 3, respectively). Corresponding sensitivities/specificities (95% confidence intervals) for pooled doses 2/3 were 93% (77-99%; ns vs. dose 1) and 75% (48-92%;p<0.05 vs. dose 1), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: With increasing doses of CM, a higher signal response in the myocardium was achieved and consequently this stress-only protocol, with CM doses of 0.10-0.15 mmol/kg combined with a semi-automatic analysis, yielded a high diagnostic performance for the detection of CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351166     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  54 in total

Review 1.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; L J Shaw; W Wijns; H J Lamb; D Poldermans; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: a new era in the detection of reversible myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  S Watkins; K G Oldroyd; S Frohwein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the clinical cardiologist.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Robert Delarochelliere; Gerald Barbeau; Bernard Noel; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.