Literature DB >> 21479846

Prognostic value of combined magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement.

Rungroj Krittayaphong1, Vithaya Chaithiraphan, Adisak Maneesai, Suthipol Udompanturak.   

Abstract

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and myocardial perfusion study by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have a diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of combined myocardial perfusion CMR and LGE in patients with known or suspected CAD. We studied patients with known or suspected CAD. All patients underwent CMR for functional study, myocardial perfusion and LGE. Myocardial ischemia by CMR was defined as a perfusion defect in patients without LGE or a perfusion defect beyond the LGE area. Patients were followed up for cardiovascular outcomes including hard cardiac events (cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, and heart failure. There were a total of 587 men and 645 women. Average age was 64.6 ± 11.1 years. LGE was detected in 326 patients (26.5%). Myocardial ischemia by CMR was detected in 423 patients (34.3%). Average follow-up duration was 34.9 ± 15.6 months. Univariate analysis showed that age, diabetes, use of beta blocker, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, wall motion abnormality, LGE, and myocardial ischemia are predictors for hard cardiac events and MACE. Multivariable analysis revealed that myocardial ischemia was the strongest predictor for hard cardiac events and MACE. Other independent predictors were age, use of beta blocker, and left ventricular mass. Myocardial ischemia by CMR has an incremental prognostic value for cardiac events in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479846     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9863-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  38 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Myocardial viability testing and the effect of early intervention in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Richard Brunken; Patrick M McCarthy; M Obadah Al-Chekakie; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Claire E Pothier; Eugene H Blackstone; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Marco A Costa; Steven Shoemaker; Hideki Futamatsu; Chris Klassen; Dominick J Angiolillo; Minh Nguyen; Alan Siuciak; Paul Gilmore; Martin M Zenni; Luis Guzman; Theodore A Bass; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Johannes Rieber; Armin Huber; Isabelle Erhard; Silvia Mueller; Michael Schweyer; Andreas Koenig; Thomas M Schiele; Karl Theisen; Uwe Siebert; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maximilian Reiser; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging a new paradigm.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications.

Authors:  Han W Kim; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: long term reproducibility of the late enhancement signal in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  H Bülow; C Klein; I Kuehn; R Hollweck; S G Nekolla; K Schreiber; F Haas; J Böhm; B Schnackenburg; R Lange; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kevin Steel; Ryan Broderick; Vijay Gandla; Eric Larose; Frederick Resnic; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Kenneth A Brown; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Risk stratification by adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Achim Seeger; Jörg Doering; Christian Herdeg; Christof Burgstahler; Claus D Claussen; Meinrad Gawaz; Stephan Miller; Andreas E May
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging to detect coronary artery lesions in children.

Authors:  Chodchanok Vijarnsorn; Michelle Noga; Daryl Schantz; Dion Pepelassis; Edythe B Tham
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of aortic stiffness by velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging on late gadolinium enhancement to predict cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Yodying Kaolawanich; Thananya Boonyasirinant
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 3.  Imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Sasan Partovi; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-term outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Howard Thom; Nicholas E J West; Vikki Hughes; Matthew Dyer; Martin Buxton; Linda D Sharples; Christopher H Jackson; Andrew M Crean
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Sorin Giusca; Gitsios Gitsioudis; Christian Erbel; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role.

Authors:  Francesca Baessato; Marco Guglielmo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Stefano Scafuri; Mario Babbaro; Rocco Mollace; Ada Collevecchio; Andrea I Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Factors predictive for delayed enhancement in cardiac resonance imaging in patients undergoing catheter ablation of premature ventricular complexes.

Authors:  Michael Ghannam; Konstantinos C Siontis; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Hubert Cochet; Pierre Jais; Mehdi Juhoor Eng; Anil Attili; Ghaith Sharaf-Dabbagh; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Krit Jongnarangsin; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-11-12

10.  Clinical assessment of adenosine stress and rest cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping for detecting ischemic and infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Sirilak Yimcharoen; Shuo Zhang; Yodying Kaolawanich; Prajak Tanapibunpon; Rungroj Krittayaphong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.