Literature DB >> 19073921

Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement.

Gaurav Chopra1, Christopher M Summa, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

One of the most challenging problems in protein structure prediction is improvement of homology models (structures within 1-3 A C(alpha) rmsd of the native structure), also known as the protein structure refinement problem. It has been shown that improvement could be achieved using in vacuo energy minimization with molecular mechanics and statistically derived continuously differentiable hybrid knowledge-based (KB) potential functions. Globular proteins, however, fold and function in aqueous solution in vivo and in vitro. In this work, we study the role of solvent in protein structure refinement. Molecular dynamics in explicit solvent and energy minimization in both explicit and implicit solvent were performed on a set of 75 native proteins to test the various energy potentials. A more stringent test for refinement was performed on 729 near-native decoys for each native protein. We use a powerfully convergent energy minimization method to show that implicit solvent (GBSA) provides greater improvement for some proteins than the KB potential: 24 of 75 proteins showing an average improvement of >20% in C(alpha) rmsd from the native structure with GBSA, compared to just 7 proteins with KB. Molecular dynamics in explicit solvent moved the structures further away from their native conformation than the initial, unrefined decoys. Implicit solvent gives rise to a deep, smooth potential energy attractor basin that pulls toward the native structure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073921      PMCID: PMC2600579          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810818105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  M R Lee; J Tsai; D Baker; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A critical analysis of continuum electrostatics: the screened Coulomb potential--implicit solvent model and the study of the alanine dipeptide and discrimination of misfolded structures of proteins.

Authors:  Sergio A Hassan; Ernest L Mehler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-04-01

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Günther Koraimann; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-15

5.  All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein.

Authors:  Carlos Simmerling; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian E Roitberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  The state of the Protein Structure Initiative.

Authors:  Eaton Lattman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-03-01

7.  The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structural biology. Protein structure initiative: phase 3 or phase out.

Authors:  Robert F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure?

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-06-01

10.  Water structure of a hydrophobic protein at atomic resolution: Pentagon rings of water molecules in crystals of crambin.

Authors:  M M Teeter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  38 in total

1.  Productive association between MHC class I and tapasin requires the tapasin transmembrane/cytosolic region and the tapasin C-terminal Ig-like domain.

Authors:  Laura C Simone; Corey J Georgesen; Peter D Simone; Xiaojian Wang; Joyce C Solheim
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Examination of the quality of various force fields and solvation models for the equilibrium simulations of GA88 and GB88.

Authors:  Juan Zeng; Yongxiu Li; John Z H Zhang; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

5.  Elastic network normal modes provide a basis for protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Pawel Gniewek; Andrzej Kolinski; Robert L Jernigan; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Fully differentiable coarse-grained and all-atom knowledge-based potentials for RNA structure evaluation.

Authors:  Julie Bernauer; Xuhui Huang; Adelene Y L Sim; Michael Levitt
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 7.  SWINGER: a clustering algorithm for concurrent coupling of atomistic and supramolecular liquids.

Authors:  Julija Zavadlav; Siewert J Marrink; Matej Praprotnik
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Evaluating mixture models for building RNA knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Adelene Y L Sim; Olivier Schwander; Michael Levitt; Julie Bernauer
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.122

9.  Ensemble-based characterization of unbound and bound states on protein energy landscape.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Tatsiana Kirys; Alexander V Tuzikov; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.