Literature DB >> 23526684

Ensemble-based characterization of unbound and bound states on protein energy landscape.

Anatoly M Ruvinsky1, Tatsiana Kirys, Alexander V Tuzikov, Ilya A Vakser.   

Abstract

Physicochemical description of numerous cell processes is fundamentally based on the energy landscapes of protein molecules involved. Although the whole energy landscape is difficult to reconstruct, increased attention to particular targets has provided enough structures for mapping functionally important subspaces associated with the unbound and bound protein structures. The subspace mapping produces a discrete representation of the landscape, further called energy spectrum. We compiled and characterized ensembles of bound and unbound conformations of six small proteins and explored their spectra in implicit solvent. First, the analysis of the unbound-to-bound changes points to conformational selection as the binding mechanism for four proteins. Second, results show that bound and unbound spectra often significantly overlap. Moreover, the larger the overlap the smaller the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the bound and unbound conformational ensembles. Third, the center of the unbound spectrum has a higher energy than the center of the corresponding bound spectrum of the dimeric and multimeric states for most of the proteins. This suggests that the unbound states often have larger entropy than the bound states. Fourth, the exhaustively long minimization, making small intrarotamer adjustments (all-atom RMSD ≤ 0.7 Å), dramatically reduces the distance between the centers of the bound and unbound spectra as well as the spectra extent. It condenses unbound and bound energy levels into a thin layer at the bottom of the energy landscape with the energy spacing that varies between 0.8-4.6 and 3.5-10.5 kcal/mol for the unbound and bound states correspondingly. Finally, the analysis of protein energy fluctuations showed that protein vibrations itself can excite the interstate transitions, including the unbound-to-bound ones.
© 2013 The Protein Society.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23526684      PMCID: PMC3690713          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  61 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

2.  Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity, and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Thermodynamic fluctuations in protein molecules.

Authors:  A Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes?

Authors:  Paula Petrone; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Picosecond fluctuating protein energy landscape mapped by pressure temperature molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Lars Meinhold; Jeremy C Smith; Akio Kitao; Ahmed H Zewail
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular evolution of affinity and flexibility in the immune system.

Authors:  Ian F Thorpe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution.

Authors:  L Wesson; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Challenges in protein docking.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Inhibition of protein interactions: co-crystalized protein-protein interfaces are nearly as good as holo proteins in rigid-body ligand docking.

Authors:  Saveliy Belkin; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Simulated unbound structures for benchmarking of protein docking in the DOCKGROUND resource.

Authors:  Tatsiana Kirys; Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Deepak Singla; Alexander V Tuzikov; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Evolutionary Conserved Positions Define Protein Conformational Diversity.

Authors:  Tadeo E Saldaño; Alexander M Monzon; Gustavo Parisi; Sebastian Fernandez-Alberti
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.