Literature DB >> 11800566

Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction.

M R Lee1, J Tsai, D Baker, P A Kollman.   

Abstract

In order adequately to sample conformational space, methods for protein structure prediction make necessary simplifications that also prevent them from being as accurate as desired. Thus, the idea of feeding them, hierarchically, into a more accurate method that samples less effectively was introduced a decade ago but has not met with more than limited success in a few isolated instances. Ideally, the final stages should be able to identify the native state, show a good correlation with native similarity in order to add value to the selection process, and refine the structures even further. In this work, we explore the possibility of using state-of-the-art explicit solvent molecular dynamics and implicit solvent free energy calculations to accomplish all three of those objectives on 12 small, single-domain proteins, four each of alpha, beta and mixed topologies. We find that this approach is very successful in ranking the native and also enhances the structure selection of predictions generated from the Rosetta method. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11800566     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  46 in total

1.  Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.

Authors:  Y N Vorobjev; J Hermans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Dynamic molecules: molecular dynamics for everyone. An internet-based access to molecular dynamic simulations: basic concepts.

Authors:  Martin Frank; Peter Gutbrod; Chokri Hassayoun; Claus-W von Der Lieth
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology-based protein structures.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

7.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study.

Authors:  Nathalie Basdevant; Harel Weinstein; Marco Ceruso
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Ab initio protein structure prediction using chunk-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Gaurav Chopra; Christopher M Summa; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Assessment of Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for the Evaluation of Protein Structures.

Authors:  Andrew M Wollacott; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.