Literature DB >> 17373704

Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure?

Jianhan Chen1, Charles L Brooks.   

Abstract

Recent advances in efficient and accurate treatment of solvent with the generalized Born approximation (GB) have made it possible to substantially refine the protein structures generated by various prediction tools through detailed molecular dynamics simulations. As demonstrated in a recent CASPR experiment, improvement can be quite reliably achieved when the initial models are sufficiently close to the native basin (e.g., 3-4 A C(alpha) RMSD). A key element to effective refinement is to incorporate reliable structural information into the simulation protocol. Without intimate knowledge of the target and prediction protocol used to generate the initial structural models, it can be assumed that the regular secondary structure elements (helices and strands) and overall fold topology are largely correct to start with, such that the protocol limits itself to the scope of refinement and focuses the sampling in vicinity of the initial structure. The secondary structures can be enforced by dihedral restraints and the topology through structural contacts, implemented as either multiple pair-wise C(alpha) distance restraints or a single sidechain distance matrix restraint. The restraints are weakly imposed with flat-bottom potentials to allow sufficient flexibility for structural rearrangement. Refinement is further facilitated by enhanced sampling of advanced techniques such as the replica exchange method (REX). In general, for single domain proteins of small to medium sizes, 3-5 nanoseconds of REX/GB refinement simulations appear to be sufficient for reasonable convergence. Clustering of the resulting structural ensembles can yield refined models over 1.0 A closer to the native structure in C(alpha) RMSD. Substantial improvement of sidechain contacts and rotamer states can also be achieved in most cases. Additional improvement is possible with longer sampling and knowledge of the robust structural features in the initial models for a given prediction protocol. Nevertheless, limitations still exist in sampling as well as force field accuracy, manifested as difficulty in refinement of long and flexible loops. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17373704     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  57 in total

1.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Examination of the quality of various force fields and solvation models for the equilibrium simulations of GA88 and GB88.

Authors:  Juan Zeng; Yongxiu Li; John Z H Zhang; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 4.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Charles L Brooks; Jana Khandogin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: new windows on mechanisms in biology.

Authors:  Guy G Dodson; David P Lane; Chandra S Verma
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models.

Authors:  Liliana Wroblewska; Anna Jagielska; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Gaurav Chopra; Christopher M Summa; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modeling of Escherichia coli Endonuclease V structure in complex with DNA.

Authors:  Karolina A Majorek; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Symmetry-restrained molecular dynamics simulations improve homology models of potassium channels.

Authors:  Andriy Anishkin; Adina L Milac; H Robert Guy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.