Literature DB >> 19064902

Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.

Jessica Rossi-Katz1, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, the authors investigated (a) the effects of task, vocal distinctiveness of the competing talkers, and meaningfulness of the competitor on older listeners' identification of a target in the presence of competition and (b) the factors that are most predictive of the variability in target identification observed among older listeners.
METHOD: Seventeen older and 5 younger adults identified a target in the presence of a competing message. Identification was measured for 2 target types (message; talker), 3 vocal-distinctiveness levels (same talker; different talkers-same sex; different talkers-different sex), and 2 competitors (meaningful speech; nonmeaningful time-reversed speech). Multiple regression analyses were used to identify variables that were predictive of intersubject variability.
RESULTS: Significant age-related differences were found in the benefit obtained from increasing vocal distinctiveness. Older listeners showed reduced target identification when (a) the competitor was normal speech compared with time-reversed speech and (b) the target was message identification compared with talker identification. Variability among listeners in the older group was partially explained by auditory and cognitive factors.
CONCLUSION: Age-related declines in multitalker environments are not solely due to lower-level deficits in perceptual organization but are also a consequence of an interaction between lower-level and higher-level processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064902     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0243)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  25 in total

1.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Christi Wise Miller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.