Literature DB >> 19058654

Computer-based identification of breast cancer using digitized mammograms.

Rajendra Acharya U1, U E Y K Ng, Y H Chang, J Yang, G J L Kaw.   

Abstract

High-quality mammography is the most effective technology presently available for breast cancer screening. Efforts to improve mammography focus on refining the technology and improving how it is administered and X-ray films are interpreted. Computer-based intelligent system for identification of the breast cancer can be very useful in diagnosis and its management. This paper presents a comparative approach for classification of three kinds of mammogram namely normal, benign and cancer. The features are extracted from the raw images using the image processing techniques and fed to the two classifiers namely: the feedforward architecture neural network classifier, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for comparison.. Our protocol uses, 360 subjects consisting of normal, benign and cancer breast conditions. We demonstrate a sensitivity and specificity of more than 90% for these classifiers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058654     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9156-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  8 in total

1.  Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.

Authors:  T C Wang; N B Karayiannis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms.

Authors:  J W Byng; M J Yaffe; R A Jong; R S Shumak; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; N F Boyd
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  Lennarth Nyström; Ingvar Andersson; Nils Bjurstam; Jan Frisell; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars Erik Rutqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; S M Rubin; C Sandrock; V L Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A M Oza; N F Boyd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D V Spicer; G Ursin; Y R Parisky; J G Pearce; D Shoupe; A Pike; M C Pike
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inger T Gram; Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Gertraud Maskarinec; Nils Bjurstam; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  A swarm optimized neural network system for classification of microcalcification in mammograms.

Authors:  J Dheeba; S Tamil Selvi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Luo; Bor-Wen Cheng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  An improved medical decision support system to identify the breast cancer using mammogram.

Authors:  Muthusamy Suganthi; Muthusamy Madheswaran
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  A New Feature Ensemble with a Multistage Classification Scheme for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Idil Isikli Esener; Semih Ergin; Tolga Yuksel
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Arnoud W Postema; Libertario Demi; Maarten P J Kuenen; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models on Mammography in Breast Cancer Classification: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tengku Muhammad Hanis; Md Asiful Islam; Kamarul Imran Musa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.