Literature DB >> 8735257

Automated analysis of mammographic densities.

J W Byng1, N F Boyd, E Fishell, R A Jong, M J Yaffe.   

Abstract

Information derived from mammographic parenchymal patterns provides one of the strongest indicators of the risk of developing breast cancer. To address several limitations of subjective classification of mammographic parenchyma into coarse density categories, we have been investigating more quantitative, objective methods of analysing the film-screen mammogram. These include measures of the skewness of the image brightness histogram, and of image texture characterized by the fractal dimension. Both measures were found to be strongly correlated with radiologists' subjective classifications of mammographic parenchyma (Spearman correlation coefficients, Rs = -0.88 and -0.76 for skewness and fractal dimension measurements, respectively). Further, neither measure was strongly dependent on simulated changes in mammographic technique. Correlation with subjective classification of mammographic density was better when both the skewness and fractal measures were used in combination than when either was used alone. This suggests that each feature provides some independent information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8735257     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/5/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  47 in total

1.  Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A computer-simulated liver phantom (virtual liver phantom) for multidetector computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Kazuo Awai; Osamu Miyazaki; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Da Liu; Taiga Goto; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Thanh M Nguyen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automated analysis of breast parenchymal patterns in whole breast ultrasound images: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Yuji Ikedo; Takako Morita; Daisuke Fukuoka; Takeshi Hara; Gobert Lee; Hiroshi Fujita; Etsuo Takada; Tokiko Endo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Jiaqing Shao; Virginie F Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Authors:  Christina M Li; W Paul Segars; Georgia D Tourassi; John M Boone; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.