Literature DB >> 9821201

Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms.

J W Byng1, M J Yaffe, R A Jong, R S Shumak, G A Lockwood, D L Tritchler, N F Boyd.   

Abstract

To evaluate the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk, a simple, observer-assisted technique called interactive thresholding was developed that allows reliable quantitative assessment of mammographic density with use of a computer workstation. Use of this technique helps confirm that mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer and is present in a large proportion of breast cancer cases. The strong relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer risk suggests that the causes of breast cancer may be better understood by identifying the factors associated with mammographically dense tissue and determining how such tissue changes as these factors vary. Furthermore, because it can be modified, mammographic density may also be a good vehicle for the development and monitoring of potential preventive strategies. Areas of ongoing investigation include evaluating a potential genetic component of mammographic density by comparing density measurements in twins and understanding changes in density relative to age, menopausal status, exogenous hormone use, and exposure to environmental carcinogens. In addition, work is ongoing to establish measurements from imaging modalities other than mammography and to relate these measurements directly to breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9821201     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.6.9821201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  63 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  The "Got D'ViBE?" study: an inter-institutional project assessing vitamin D and mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Toni J Lewis; William D Dupont; Kathleen M Egan; Corey D Jones; Anthony C Disher; William R Riddle; Alecia Malin Fair
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

3.  Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Richard J Santen; Gina R Petroni; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Mark E Smolkin; Fathima S Sheriff; Jose Russo
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Authors:  Thomas R Nelson; Laura I Cerviño; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Mammographic density changes following discontinuation of tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Young-Seon Kim; Ann Yi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Mammographic Density and Circulating Sex Hormones: a Cross-Sectional Study in Postmenopausal Korean Women.

Authors:  Kayoung Lee; Jung Eun Yoo; Tuong Linh Nguyen; John Llewelyn Hopper; Yun-Mi Song
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of diindolylmethane for breast cancer biomarker modulation in patients taking tamoxifen.

Authors:  Cynthia A Thomson; H H Sherry Chow; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise J Roe; Alison Stopeck; Gertraud Maskarinec; Maria Altbach; Pavani Chalasani; Chuan Huang; Meghan B Strom; Jean-Philippe Galons; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Hormonal determinants of nipple aspirate fluid yield among breast cancer cases and screening controls.

Authors:  Angela J Fought; Claire McGathey; Denise M Scholtens; Richard E Heinz; Rick Lowe; Yvonne B Feeney; Oukseub Lee; Thomas E Kmiecik; Judith A Wolfman; Charles V Clevenger; Peter H Gann; Susan Gapstur; Robert T Chatterton; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  An automated approach for estimation of breast density.

Authors:  John J Heine; Michael J Carston; Christopher G Scott; Kathleen R Brandt; Fang-Fang Wu; Vernon Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Charlotte C Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta A Geller; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.