Literature DB >> 7799496

Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

K Kerlikowske1, D Grady, S M Rubin, C Sandrock, V L Ernster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of screening mammography by age, number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, and duration of follow-up.
DESIGN: Literature review and meta-analysis. DATA IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS: Literature search of English-language studies reported from January 1966 to October 31, 1993, using MEDLINE, manual literature review, and consultation with experts. A total of 13 studies were selected, and their results were combined using meta-analytic techniques based on the assumption of fixed effects. MAIN
RESULTS: The overall summary relative risk (RR) estimate for breast cancer mortality for women aged 50 to 74 years undergoing screening mammography compared with those who did not was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.83). The magnitude of the benefit in this age group was similar regardless of number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, or duration of follow-up. In contrast, none of the summary RR estimates for women aged 40 to 49 years was significantly less than 1.0, irrespective of screening intervention or duration of follow-up. The overall summary RR estimate in women aged 40 to 49 years was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13); the summary RR estimate for those studies that used two-view mammography was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12) compared with 1.02 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.44) for those studies that used one-view mammography, and for those studies with 7 to 9 years of follow-up, the summary RR estimate was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.27) compared with 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.06) for those studies with 10 to 12 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Screening mammography significantly reduces breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 to 74 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up, regardless of screening interval or number of mammographic views per screen. There is no reduction in breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up. Screening mammography may be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 10 to 12 years of follow-up, but the same benefit could probably be achieved by beginning screening at menopause or 50 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7799496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  169 in total

Review 1.  The menopause and its treatment in perspective.

Authors:  F Al-Azzawi
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Evidence based case report: Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  A Lucassen; E Watson; D Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

Review 3.  Breast cancer in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors:  J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  MR imaging of hypertrophic olivary degeneration: is there a role for metaanalysis?

Authors:  L S Medina
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Improving the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M J Borugian; L Kan; S R Harris; E J Rousseau; S E Thorne; J A Vestrup; C J Wright; A J Coldman; T G Hislop
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

9.  Changes in Canadian women's mammography rates since the implementation of mass screening programs.

Authors:  C E De Grasse; A M O'Connor; J Boulet; N Edwards; H Bryant; K Breithaupt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Breast cancer screening: can we talk?

Authors:  R G Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.