Literature DB >> 8120917

Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk.

D V Spicer1, G Ursin, Y R Parisky, J G Pearce, D Shoupe, A Pike, M C Pike.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been known for some time that oral contraceptives substantially reduce the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, but they do not reduce the risk of breast cancer. A hormonal contraceptive regimen has been developed which uses a gonadotropin-releasing hormone against (GnRHA) to suppress ovarian function, and this regimen includes the administration of very low doses of both estrogen and progestogen. This hormonal contraceptive regimen attempts to minimize exposure of the breast epithelium to these steroids and to preserve the maximum beneficial effects of estrogen, while still preventing endometrial hyperplasia.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine whether changes occurred in mammographic densities between baseline and 1 year for women on this hormonal contraceptive regimen with reduced estrogen and progestogen levels compared with women in a control group.
METHODS: Twenty-one women were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the GnRHA-based contraceptive group (14 women) or to a control group (seven women). The contraceptive group received the following: 7.5 mg leuprolide acetate depot by intramuscular injection every 28 days; 0.625 mg conjugated estrogen by mouth for 6 days out of 7 every week; and 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate orally for 13 days every fourth 28-day cycle. The control group received no medication. Baseline and 1-year follow-up mammograms of contraceptive and control subjects were reviewed in a blinded fashion by two radiologists.
RESULTS: Comparison of the changes between the baseline and 1-year mammograms in the two groups of women showed significant (P = .039) reduction in mammographic densities at 1 year for women on the contraceptive regimen. Assessing the reduction in mammographic densities by noting the fineness of fibrous septae showed a highly significant (P = .0048) difference in the contraceptive regimen group. One of the women on the contraceptive regimen was withdrawn from the study because of poor compliance.
CONCLUSION: The reduced estrogen and progestogen exposures to the breast that were achieved by the hormonal contraceptive regimen resulted in substantial reductions in follow-up mammographic densities at 1 year compared with baseline. Although there is no direct evidence that such a reduction in densities will lead to a reduced risk of breast cancer, indirect evidence for a protective effect of this regimen is that early menopause reduces breast cancer risk, and that menopause is associated with a reduction in mammographic densities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Biology; Breast Cancer--prevention and control; California; Cancer; Case Control Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Developed Countries; Diseases; Endocrine System; Estrogenic Substances, Conjugated; Estrogens; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Hormones; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Menopause; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Physiology; Pituitary Hormone Releasing Hormones; Reproduction; Research Report; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120917     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.6.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  20 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  M C Pike; C L Pearce
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Vitamin D and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bettina Drake
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Progesterone and Breast Cancer: an NCI Workshop Report.

Authors:  Neeraja Sathyamoorthy; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Computer-based identification of breast cancer using digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Rajendra Acharya U; U E Y K Ng; Y H Chang; J Yang; G J L Kaw
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; James J Dignam; Stephanie R Land; Martine Salane; Angela M Capra; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Endometriosis and mammographic density measurements in the Nurses' Health Study II.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Donna Spiegelman; Kimberly A Bertrand; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Green tea, soy, and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin; Woon-Puay Koh; Renwei Wang; Jian-Min Yuan; Kei-Siong Khoo; Mimi C Yu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Mammographic density.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Clinical Factors Associated with Asymptomatic Women Having Inconclusive Screening Mammography Results: Experiences from a Single Medical Center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Li Wang; Pi-Shan Hsu; Chia-Yen Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.