Literature DB >> 19054000

Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings.

Giovanni Di Benedetto1, Sara Cecchini, Luca Grassetti, Silvia Baldassarre, Gianluca Valeri, Luca Leva, Gian Marco Giuseppetti, Aldo Bertani.   

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the detection of breast implant rupture and to make a correlation with findings at explantation. The study population consisted of 63 women with 82 implants, undergoing surgical explantation. Implant rupture status was blindly determined obtaining diagnosis of rupture, possible rupture, or intact implant. Strictly predetermined rupture criteria were applied and compared with findings at surgery, which were considered the gold standard. False-positives and false-negatives were retrospectively evaluated to identify pitfalls in the investigation. All associations between imaging signs and surgical findings were evaluated by using chi-square test. The respective sensitivity and specificity of investigations are reported. Our experience suggests that MRI is the more accurate method for identification of breast implant rupture, even if it should be performed following the diagnostic algorithm proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19054000     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  19 in total

1.  Study of breast implant rupture: MRI versus surgical findings.

Authors:  A Vestito; F F Mangieri; A Ancona; C Minervini; V Perchinunno; S Rinaldi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  ED breast cases and other breast emergencies.

Authors:  Nasim Khadem; Sravanthi Reddy; Sandy Lee; Linda Larsen; Daphne Walker
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-11-05

3.  Role of US in evaluating breast implant integrity.

Authors:  Michele Telegrafo; Marco Moschetta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-23

4.  Breast imaging in the young: the role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening, diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Dorria Saleh Salem; Rasha Mohamed Kamal; Sahar Mahmoud Mansour; Lamiaa Adel Salah; Rasha Wessam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  PIP breast implants: rupture rate and correlation with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Moschetta; M Telegrafo; I Cornacchia; L Vincenti; V Ranieri; A Cirili; L Rella; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Lillian T Bellfi; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) incidence of rupture: a retrospective MR analysis in 64 patients.

Authors:  Mariella Scotto di Santolo; Bianca Cusati; Alfonso Ragozzino; Nicoletta Dell'Aprovitola; Alessandra Acquaviva; Michele Altiero; Antonello Accurso; Albina Riccardi; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-12

8.  Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of silicone breast implants.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Isabelle Himsl; Karin Hellerhoff; Doris Mayr; Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer; Nina Ditsch; Bernhard Krauss; Klaus Friese; Maximilian F Reiser; Miriam S Lenhard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Breast prosthesis: Management of patients after plastic surgery.

Authors:  E Bassetti; F Pediconi; M L Luciani; E Santucci; E Miglio; R Candreva
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-03

10.  CT measurement of breast glandular tissue and its association with testicular cancer.

Authors:  Eyal Klang; Noa Rozendorn; Steve Raskin; Orith Portnoy; Miri Sklair; Edith M Marom; Eli Konen; Michal M Amitai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.