Literature DB >> 23396957

Breast prosthesis: Management of patients after plastic surgery.

E Bassetti1, F Pediconi, M L Luciani, E Santucci, E Miglio, R Candreva.   

Abstract

Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction are increasingly common operations. All radiologists need to be able to recognize the normal appearances of the more commonly used implants on various imaging modalities and breast radiologists in particular are facing new challenges when imaging the women involved. This work aims to review the normal and abnormal findings in women undergoing breast implant surgery using ultrasonography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast implant rupture; Breast implants; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Ultrasound

Year:  2011        PMID： 23396957      PMCID： PMC3558103          DOI： 10.1016/j.jus.2011.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN： 1876-7931


  20 in total

1.  Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Gian M Giuseppetti; Pietro Panizza; Massimo Bazzocchi; Alfonso Fausto; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Augmentation mammoplasty: normal and abnormal findings with mammography and US.

Authors:  M A Ganott; K M Harris; Z S Ilkhanipour; M A Costa-Greco
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Benedetto; Sara Cecchini; Luca Grassetti; Silvia Baldassarre; Gianluca Valeri; Luca Leva; Gian Marco Giuseppetti; Aldo Bertani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  High-pressure injection of silicone gel into an axilla--a complication of closed compression capsulotomy of the breast. Case report.

Authors:  J M Goin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Pressure resistance of breast implants as a function of implantation time.

Authors:  J H van Rappard; G J Sonneveld; R van Twisk; J M Borghouts
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.

Authors:  U Fischer; L Kopka; E Grabbe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; D B Plewes; R S Shumak; G C Catzavelos; L S Di Prospero; M J Yaffe; V Goel; E Ramsay; P L Chart; D E Cole; G A Taylor; M Cutrara; T H Samuels; J P Murphy; J M Murphy; S A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound.

Authors:  D M Ikeda; H B Borofsky; R J Herfkens; A M Sawyer-Glover; R L Birdwell; G H Glover
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; K Schelfout; L Dijckmans; J C Van Der Auwera; J Weyler; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315
View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of US in evaluating breast implant integrity.

Authors:  Michele Telegrafo; Marco Moschetta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-23

2.  Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria.

Authors:  Cláudia Sá Dos Reis; Isabelle Gremion; Nicole Richli Meystre
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-01-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.