Literature DB >> 23819032

Breast imaging in the young: the role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening, diagnosis and follow-up.

Dorria Saleh Salem1, Rasha Mohamed Kamal, Sahar Mahmoud Mansour, Lamiaa Adel Salah, Rasha Wessam.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of breast cancer in young individuals (younger than 40 years old) poses a real challenge to breast radiologists because their breast tissue is often denser than the breast tissue of older women. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be particularly helpful in such situations. The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommended breast MRI screening as an adjunct to mammography for: BRCA mutation carriers and their first-degree relatives; women with a lifetime breast cancer risk ≥20% to 25%; women with a history of chest radiation between ages of 10 and 30 years; and women with predisposing genetic syndromes. Currently, breast MRI demonstrates a high sensitivity in the range of 93-100%. As many benign lesions also show enhancement or other atypical features on MRI, the primary weakness of contrast enhanced MRI remains in its low specificity, reported to be in the range of 37-97%. Breast MRI is helpful in demonstrating the true tumor size initially, as well as identifying residual tumor following the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy. In general, sensitivities ranging from 61% to 86% for detecting residual disease have been reported. The absence of enhancement virtually excludes a recurrence and the presence of enhancement is very specific for tumor even in the radiated breast. MRI is also the preferred modality for assessment of the breast after re- constructive surgery. The role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in breast diagnosis will continue to evolve as technology improves and clinical experience with new techniques expands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); young females

Year:  2013        PMID: 23819032      PMCID: PMC3695543          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.05.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  35 in total

1.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Ingo B Runnebaum; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Pamela M McMahon; Chung Y Kong; Daniel B Kopans; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture.

Authors:  David P Gorczyca; Stephanie M Gorczyca; Kathryn L Gorczyca
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Psychological impact of recall in high-risk breast MRI screening.

Authors:  Suzanne M O'Neill; Wendy S Rubinstein; Stephen F Sener; Scott M Weissman; Anna C Newlin; Daniel K West; David B Ecanow; Alfred W Rademaker; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  P F Liu; J F Debatin; R F Caduff; G Kacl; E Garzoli; G P Krestin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Indications for breast MRI: case-based review.

Authors:  Amy Argus; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Role of MRI in screening women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  7 in total

1.  How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?

Authors:  Parisa Pishdad; Ameneh Moosavi; Reza Jalli; Fariba Zarei; Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  Screening through Temperature and Thermal Pattern Analysis in DMBA - Induced Breast Cancer in Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Evy Poerbaningtyas; Respati S Dradjat; Agustina T Endharti; Setyawan P Sakti; Edi Widjajanto
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-08-01

3.  The Impact of Pre-Operative Breast MRI on Surgical Waiting Time.

Authors:  Michelle Zhang; Simon Sun; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Transfer Learning in Breast Cancer Diagnoses via Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Gelan Ayana; Kokeb Dese; Se-Woon Choe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bulent Citgez; Banu Yigit; Soysal Bas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Rational Approach to Finding Genes Encoding Molecular Biomarkers: Focus on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nathalie Schneider; Ellen Reed; Faddy Kamel; Enrico Ferrari; Mikhail Soloviev
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Likelihood of Breast Screening Uptake among Reproductive-aged Women in Ethiopia: A Baseline Survey for Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Feleke Doyore Agide; Gholamreza Garmaroudi; Roya Sadeghi; Elham Shakibazadeh; Mehdi Yaseri; Zewdie Birhanu Koricha
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2019-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.