Literature DB >> 22430679

Study of breast implant rupture: MRI versus surgical findings.

A Vestito1, F F Mangieri, A Ancona, C Minervini, V Perchinunno, S Rinaldi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the selective study breast implant integrity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the signs of breast implant rupture observed at breast MR examinations of 157 implants and determined the sensitivity and specificity of the technique in diagnosing implant rupture by comparing MR data with findings at surgical explantation.
RESULTS: The linguine and the salad-oil signs were statistically the most significant signs for diagnosing intracapsular rupture; the presence of siliconomas/seromas outside the capsule and/or in the axillary lymph nodes calls for immediate explantation.
CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous reports, we found a close correlation between imaging signs and findings at explantation. Breast MR imaging can be considered the gold standard in the study of breast implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430679     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0807-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  26 in total

1.  Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danish women.

Authors:  L R Hölmich; K Kjøller; I Vejborg; C Conrad; S Sletting; J K McLaughlin; J Fryzek; V Breiting; A Jørgensen; J H Olsen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation.

Authors:  Lisbet R Hölmich; Ilse Vejborg; Carsten Conrad; Susanne Sletting; Joseph K McLaughlin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Granulomatous reaction to silicone in axillary lymph nodes. A case report with cytologic findings.

Authors:  A Santos-Briz; F López-Ríos; A Santos-Briz; P P De Agustín
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria.

Authors:  W A Berg; C I Caskey; U M Hamper; J E Kuhlman; N D Anderson; B W Chang; S Sheth; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography.

Authors:  W A Berg; C I Caskey; U M Hamper; N D Anderson; B W Chang; S Sheth; E A Zerhouni; J E Kuhlman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound.

Authors:  D M Ikeda; H B Borofsky; R J Herfkens; A M Sawyer-Glover; R L Birdwell; G H Glover
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings.

Authors:  Anabel Medeiros Scaranelo; Américo Ferreira Marques; Elizabeth Brenda Smialowski; Henriquel Manoel Lederman
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 1.044

8.  Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms.

Authors:  J Sánchez-Guerrero; G A Colditz; E W Karlson; D J Hunter; F E Speizer; M H Liang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  MR imaging of breast implants.

Authors:  D P Gorczyca
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Axillary silicone lymphadenopathy presenting with a lump and altered sensation in the breast: a case report.

Authors:  Simon T Adams; Julie Cox; G Sam Rao
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  MRI screening for silicone breast implant rupture: accuracy, inter- and intraobserver variability using explantation results as reference standard.

Authors:  M C Maijers; F B Niessen; J F H Veldhuizen; M J P F Ritt; R A Manoliu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.