Literature DB >> 10457279

Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements.

P Ravaud1, J L Reny, B Giraudeau, R Porcher, M Dougados, C Roux.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is a major outcome measure in osteoporosis. The BMD changes observed must exceed the variability inherent in the measurement process to be considered related to disease progression. The objective of the study was to estimate short-term variability of BMD measurement and to propose a cut-off value for the smallest detectable BMD changes for an individual. To estimate the short-term variability, 70 healthy postmenopausal women aged 53 +/- 4 years (group 1) and 57 elderly osteoporotic postmenopausal women aged 80 +/- 6 years (group 2) had two repeated BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and the proximal femur with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, with complete repositioning within 1 h. Cut-offs derived from short-term variability were either estimated from the coefficient of variation (CV) (which is a function of the measured value) or from the standard deviation (SD), and applied to 330 postmenopausal women (group 3) who had BMD measurements at baseline and 2 years later. The short-term intrasubject variability was greater at the lumbar spine in group 2 versus group 1 (0.0123 vs. 0.0059 g/cm2, p < 10-4), whereas it was not at the femoral neck (0.0098 vs. 0.0076 g/cm2, p = 0.28). There was no statistically significant correlation between short-term intrasubject variability (SD) and BMD as demonstrated with an analysis of covariance (p values ranging from 0.17 to 0.90). Cut-offs estimated with SD and CV were individually applied to group 3 patients. Using these two cut-offs, discrepancies in assessment of progression were observed in 1.7-8.6% of cases. Short-term BMD variability is constant in a wide range of BMD values. Consequently, to determine cut-off values for the smallest detectable differences in BMD at the individual level, precision errors should be based on SD (expressed in absolute units) rather than on CV (expressed in percentage).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457279     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.8.1449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  20 in total

1.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Variability of Denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Laroche; C Baradat; A Ruyssen-Witrand; Y Degboe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Bone Mineral Density Response from Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  So-Young Kim; Meng Zhang; Richard Bockman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; M J Green; M A Quinn; H Marzo-Ortega; S Proudman; Z Karim; R J Wakefield; P G Conaghan; S Stewart; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Differential effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density and axial transmission ultrasound measurements in cortical bone.

Authors:  K M Knapp; G M Blake; T D Spector; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and 20-microgram oral contraceptives on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; Mahbubu Rahman; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lian X Bi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Reproducibility of DXA measurements of bone mineral density and body composition in children.

Authors:  Cheryl M Leonard; Melissa A Roza; Ronald D Barr; Colin E Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-04

8.  Contribution of fat-free mass and fat mass to bone mineral density among reproductive-aged women of white, black, and Hispanic race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jennifer L Newman; Mahbubur Rahman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Hand bone densitometry: a more sensitive standard for the assessment of early bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Glenn Haugeberg; Michael J Green; Philip G Conaghan; Mark Quinn; Richard Wakefield; Susanna M Proudman; Sheena Stewart; Elizabeth Hensor; Paul Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Racial difference in the correlates of bone mineral content/density and age at peak among reproductive-aged women.

Authors:  A B Berenson; M Rahman; G Wilkinson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.