Literature DB >> 19050692

Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Nigel Borley1, Mark R Feneley.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer represents an increasing health burden. The past 20 years, with the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), has seen prostate cancer move increasingly from a condition that presented with locally advanced disease or metastases to one that is found upon screening. More is also known about the pathology of pre-malignant lesions. Diagnosis relies on trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) to obtain biopsies from throughout the prostate, but TRUS is not useful for staging. Imaging for staging, such as magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, still has a low accuracy compared with pathological specimens. Current techniques are also inaccurate in identifying lymph node and bony metastases. Nomograms have been developed from the PSA, Gleason score and clinical grading to help quantify the risk of extra-capsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens. Improved clinical staging modalities are required for more reliable prediction of pathological stage and for monitoring of response to treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050692      PMCID: PMC3735216          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2008.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  36 in total

1.  Significance of the palpable prostatic nodule.

Authors:  H J JEWETT
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-03-10

2.  Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis.

Authors:  K K Yu; H Hricak; R Alagappan; D M Chernoff; P Bacchetti; C J Zaloudek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer.

Authors:  T Y Chan; J I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  W J Catalona; A W Partin; K M Slawin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; J B deKernion; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; E N Subong; R E Parson; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; P C Southwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cancer statistics, 2005.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Brian R Lane; Craig D Zippe; Robert Abouassaly; Lynn Schoenfield; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Avi Beri; Stephan Jeschke; Wolfgang Sega; Karl Leeb; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Is prostate-specific antigen density more useful than prostate-specific antigen levels in the diagnosis of prostate cancer?

Authors:  M Ohori; J K Dunn; P T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  W J Catalona; J P Richie; J B deKernion; F R Ahmann; T L Ratliff; B L Dalkin; L R Kavoussi; M T MacFarlane; P C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P H Gann; C H Hennekens; M J Stampfer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Shen; Yu-Chun Zhu; Wu-Ran Wei; Yong-Zhong Li; Jie Yang; Yu-Tao Li; Ding-Ming Li; Jia Wang; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Editorial and introduction to Asian Journal of Andrology Prostate Cancer special issue.

Authors:  Roger Kirby; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer clinical application.

Authors:  Bing Li; Yong Du; Hanfeng Yang; Yayong Huang; Jun Meng; Dongmei Xiao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  A new 5-grading score in the diagnosis of prostate cancer with real-time elastography.

Authors:  Guang Xu; Lijing Feng; Minghua Yao; Jian Wu; Lehang Guo; Xudong Yao; Lixia Zhao; Huixiong Xu; Rong Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 5.  Prostate cancer: the need for biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Juliana Felgueiras; Joana Vieira Silva; Margarida Fardilha
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Differential expression of Annexin 2, SPINK1, and Hsp60 predict progression of prostate cancer through bifurcated WHO Gleason score categories in African American men.

Authors:  Desta A Beyene; Tammey J Naab; Norma F Kanarek; Victor Apprey; Ashwini Esnakula; Farahan A Khan; Marc R Blackman; Collis A Brown; Tamaro S Hudson
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Transrectal electrical impedance tomography of the prostate: spatially coregistered pathological findings for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Yuqing Wan; Andrea Borsic; John Heaney; John Seigne; Alan Schned; Michael Baker; Shaun Wason; Alex Hartov; Ryan Halter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy? A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Giovanni Saredi; Saredi Giovanni; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Francesco Fidanza; Fidanza Francesco; Stefano De Stefani; De Stefani Stefano; Salvatore Micali; Micali Salvatore; Paterlini Maurizio; Maurizio Paterlini; Roberto D'Amico; Giampaolo Bianchi; Bianchi Giampaolo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Comparison of meta-analyses among elastosonography (ES) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging techniques in the application of prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Qiaohong Ouyang; Zhongxiang Duan; Jixiao Lei; Guangli Jiao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-29

10.  Prostate cancer in primary care, port harcourt, Nigeria.

Authors:  Andrew Bock-Oruma; S Oghu Iboh; Dan-Jumbo Prince
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.