Literature DB >> 9933053

Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer.

T Y Chan1, J I Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine both how the diagnosis of an atypical biopsy influences a urologist's decision to repeat the biopsy and the outcome of rebiopsy.
METHODS: Of 200 atypical biopsies that we confirmed from outside consultations to the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1992 to 1993, we were able to retrieve follow-up information for 144 cases. Each atypical biopsy was evaluated for the reason for atypia (atrophic glands, rule out [r/o] adenosis, atypical not otherwise specified [NOS; insufficient cytologic and/or architectural atypia], r/o prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia [PIN], inflammation, crush artifact) and a favored diagnosis (cancerous, benign, and undetermined).
RESULTS: Of the 144 atypical biopsies, 92 were rebiopsied (63.9%). The time from the initial atypical biopsy to rebiopsy ranged from 0.5 months to 3 years (63% less than 6 months; 39% less than 3 months). Rebiopsy revealed carcinoma in 48.9%, benign in 38%, atypical in 8.7%, and PIN in 4.4%. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was lower in men who did not undergo a repeat biopsy (6 versus 7.8) (rank sum analysis, P = 0.04). No correlation was found between PSA level and results of the rebiopsy. Of the atypical biopsies in which cancer was favored, 61% were cancerous on rebiopsy versus 33% where a benign process was favored. The three reasons for atypical biopsies that seemed to correlate with outcome of rebiopsy were atypical NOS (68% cancer on rebiopsy); inflammation (63% cancer on rebiopsy); and r/o adenosis (36% cancer on rebiopsy).
CONCLUSIONS: Although 48.9% of the rebiopsied cases were cancerous, only 63% of men underwent rebiopsy, raising a concern that cancers are being missed in those cases not rebiopsied after an atypical diagnosis. Although there was a trend for serum PSA to correlate with outcome of rebiopsy, this correlation was not significant, and even men with serum PSA less than 4 ng/mL had a 33% risk of cancer on rebiopsy. Although histologic features of the atypical foci may be useful as factors in determining the urgency for rebiopsy, they also were not statistically significant in predicting outcome. Men with atypical diagnoses should undergo rebiopsy regardless of serum PSA levels and regardless of why the lesions were atypical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933053     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00510-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

2.  Evaluation of routine application of P504S, 34betaE12 and p63 immunostaining on 250 prostate needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Kitty Pavlakis; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Theodoros Kapetanakis; Alkiviadis Gregorakis; Sofia Athanassiadou; Olympia Tzaida; Constantinos Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  [Importance of second opinions on histology of prostate biopsy specimens].

Authors:  B Helpap; U Oehler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  Managing high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands on prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ridwan Alam; Mark W Ball; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation.

Authors:  C Warlick; K Feia; J Tomasini; C Iwamoto; B Lindgren; M Risk
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an overview.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

7.  Does asymptomatic inflammation increase PSA? A histopathological study comparing benign and malignant tissue biopsy specimens.

Authors:  B H Gümüş; N Neşe; M I Gündüz; A R Kandiloglu; Y Ceylan; C Büyüksu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Nigel Borley; Mark R Feneley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Pathologic results of radical prostatectomies in patients with simultaneous atypical small acinar proliferation and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kwang Ho Kim; Yun Beom Kim; Jeong Kee Lee; Yoon Jung Kim; Tae Young Jung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

10.  Analysis of repeated 24-core saturation prostate biopsy: Inverse association between asymptomatic histological inflammation and prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Akira Komiya; Akihiro Morii; Hiroaki Iida; Takatoshi Ito; Hideki Fuse
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.