Literature DB >> 19767761

Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy? A prospective, randomized trial.

Giovanni Saredi1, Saredi Giovanni, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Francesco Fidanza, Fidanza Francesco, Stefano De Stefani, De Stefani Stefano, Salvatore Micali, Micali Salvatore, Paterlini Maurizio, Maurizio Paterlini, Roberto D'Amico, Giampaolo Bianchi, Bianchi Giampaolo.   

Abstract

Transperineal prostate biopsy is a procedure that can be used to obtain histological samples from the prostate. To improve both the quality of the biopsy core samples and prostate cancer detection, we are currently performing a prospective, randomized trial comparing prostate biopsy samples obtained using an 18 G-needle to those obtained using a 16 G needle. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate pain and complication rates in both groups in order to assess whether performing a prostate biopsy with a larger calibre needle is a feasible procedure. One hundred and eighty-seven patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy were prospectively evaluated and divided into two groups. The first group (94 patients, Group A) received a transperineal prostate biopsy using a 16 G-needle and the second group (93 patients, Group B) underwent transperineal prostate biopsy with an 18 G-needle. Anaesthesia was obtained with a single perineal injection at the prostatic apex in all subjects. A visual analogue scale (VAS) and facial expression scale (FES) were used to assess pain during multiple steps of the procedure in each group. A detailed questionnaire was used to obtain information about drug use because it could potentially influence the pain and complications that patients experienced. Two weeks after the procedure, early and late complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using non-parametric tests. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and drug use were similar at baseline between the two groups. Pain during prostate biopsy, which was measured with both the VAS and FES instruments, did not differ significantly between the 18- and 16 G-needle groups, and no significant differences were found in early or late complication rates between the groups. Transperineal prostate biopsy with a 16 G-needle is a feasible procedure in terms of pain and complication rates. Further studies with larger patient populations are required to assess whether or not this procedure can improve prostate cancer detection rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767761      PMCID: PMC3735321          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2009.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles.

Authors:  T H Helbich; M Rudas; A Haitel; P D Kohlberger; M Thurnher; M Gnant; P Wunderbaldinger; G Wolf; G H Mostbeck
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles.

Authors:  M E Nath; T M Robinson; H Tobon; D M Chough; J H Sumkin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; George Casella; R John Seppala; Galin L Jones; Barbara A Mishler; Junqi Qian; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Giovanni Novella; Maria Angela Cerruto; Antonio Galfano; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Pea; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Does experimental pain assessment before biopsy predict for pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Sedat Soyupek; Murat Bozlu; Abdullah Armağan; Alper Ozorak; Hakki Perk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Initial extended transrectal prostate biopsy--are more prostate cancers detected with 18 cores than with 12 cores?

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Marco Roscigno; Marco Raber; Federico Dehò; Tommaso Maga; Matteo Zanoni; Matteo Riva; Mattia Sangalli; Luciano Nava; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  M Schostak; F Christoph; M Müller; R Heicappell; G Goessl; M Staehler; K Miller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Raber; Vincenzo Scattoni; Marco Roscigno; Federico Dehò; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Valerio Di Girolamo; Francesco Montorsi; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.

Authors:  Ryoei Hara; Yoshimasa Jo; Tomohiro Fujii; Norio Kondo; Teruhiko Yokoyoma; Yoshiyuki Miyaji; Atsushi Nagai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  L V Rodríguez; M K Terris
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Shen; Yu-Chun Zhu; Wu-Ran Wei; Yong-Zhong Li; Jie Yang; Yu-Tao Li; Ding-Ming Li; Jia Wang; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  How safe is the use of ultrasound-guided cutting needle biopsy in the head and neck?

Authors:  Jens Pfeiffer; Gerd J Ridder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effect of needle size on cancer detection, pain, bleeding and infection in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies: A prospective trial.

Authors:  Michael McCormack; Alain Duclos; Mathieu Latour; Marie Hélène McCormack; Daniel Liberman; Orchidee Djahangirian; Josette Bergeron; Luc Valiquette; Kevin Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Transperineal prostate biopsies for diagnosis of prostate cancer are well tolerated: a prospective study using patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Karan Wadhwa; Lina Carmona-Echeveria; Timur Kuru; Gabriele Gaziev; Eva Serrao; Deepak Parashar; Julia Frey; Ivailo Dimov; Jonas Seidenader; Pete Acher; Gordon Muir; Andrew Doble; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Boris Hadaschik; Christof Kastner
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Rong Wu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Shuai Wang; Xiao-Wan Bo; Bo-Ji Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.