Literature DB >> 23718610

Transrectal electrical impedance tomography of the prostate: spatially coregistered pathological findings for prostate cancer detection.

Yuqing Wan1, Andrea Borsic, John Heaney, John Seigne, Alan Schned, Michael Baker, Shaun Wason, Alex Hartov, Ryan Halter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer ranks as one of the most common malignancies and currently represents the second leading cancer-specific cause of death in men. The current use of single modality transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for biopsy guidance has a limited sensitivity and specificity for accurately identifying cancerous lesions within the prostate. This study introduces a novel prostate cancer imaging method that combines TRUS with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and reports on initial clinical findings based on in vivo measurements.
METHODS: The ultrasound system provides anatomic information, which guides EIT image reconstruction. EIT reconstructions are correlated with semiquantitative pathological findings. Thin plate spline warping transformations are employed to overlay electrical impedance images and pathological maps describing the spatial distribution of prostate cancer, with the latter used as reference for data analysis. Clinical data were recorded from a total of 50 men prior to them undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment. Student's t-tests were employed to statistically examine the electrical property difference between cancerous tissue and benign tissue as defined through histological assessment of the excised gland.
RESULTS: Example EIT reconstructions are presented along with a statistical analysis comparing EIT and pathology. An average transformation error of 1.67% is found when 381 spatially coregistered pathological images are compared with their target EIT reconstructed counterparts. At EIT signal frequencies of 0.4, 3.2, and 25.6 kHz, paired-testing demonstrated that the conductivity of cancerous regions is significantly greater than that of benign regions ( p < 0.0304).
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary clinical findings suggest the potential benefits electrical impedance measurements might have for prostate cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23718610      PMCID: PMC3676380          DOI: 10.1118/1.4803498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Electrical impedance tomography reconstruction for three-dimensional imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  A Borsic; R Halter; Y Wan; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Sensitivity study of an ultrasound coupled transrectal electrical impedance tomography system for prostate imaging.

Authors:  Y Wan; R Halter; A Borsic; P Manwaring; A Hartov; K Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 3.  Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).

Authors:  R H Bayford
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Bioimpedance: novel use of a minimally invasive technique for cancer localization in the intact prostate.

Authors:  B R Lee; W W Roberts; D G Smith; H W Ko; J I Epstein; K Lecksell; A W Partin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers.

Authors:  E Kuligowska; M A Barish; H M Fenlon; M Blake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Should ultrasound criteria of the prostate be redefined to better evaluate when and where to biopsy.

Authors:  T Vo; M D Rifkin; T L Peters
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  Sensitivity study and optimization of a 3D electric impedance tomography prostate probe.

Authors:  A Borsic; R Halter; Y Wan; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.833

9.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Shadab Khan; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Jason Pettus; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 2.  Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin Sanchez; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Incorporating a biopsy needle as an electrode in transrectal electrical impedance imaging.

Authors:  Yuqing Wan; Andrea Borsic; Alex Hartov; Ryan Halter
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

4.  An Ex Vivo Study of Outward Electrical Impedance Tomography (OEIT) for Intravascular Imaging.

Authors:  Yuan Luo; Dong Huang; Zi-Yu Huang; Tzung K Hsiai; Yu-Chong Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  An Impedance Readout IC with Ratio-Based Measurement Techniques for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Song-I Cheon; Soon-Jae Kweon; Youngin Kim; Jimin Koo; Sohmyung Ha; Minkyu Je
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  The clinical application of electrical impedance technology in the detection of malignant neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela A Pathiraja; Ruwan A Weerakkody; Alexander C von Roon; Paul Ziprin; Richard Bayford
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.