Literature DB >> 7358907

Systematic errors in indirect estimates of basilar membrane travel times.

M A Ruggero.   

Abstract

There exist in the literature three attempts to derive basilar membrane travel times from the phase versus frequency characteristics of responses to tones in the auditory nerve [Anderson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 4., 1131-1139 (1971)], cochlear nucleus [Gibson et al., in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, edited by Evans and Wilson (Academic, New York, 1977), pp. 57-68], and basilar membrane [Robles et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 926-939 (1976)]. It is argued in this paper that these derivations probably have overestimated the actual mechanical travel times. Travel time was originally defined by von Békésy as the latency between the onset of a click stimulus and the onset of basilar membrane vibration. For a linear bandpass system, the frequency-domain equivalent of this latency is the high-frequency asymptotoic slope of the phase lag versus frequency characteristic, which is not generally a linear function. In the neural studies (auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus) it was assumed that the phase versus frequency characteristic was a straight line. Slopes derived under a linear assumption are probably closer to the weighted average group delay (i.e., the center of gravity of the click response) than they are to travel time. In the Mössbauer study of basilar membrane mechanics the latency of the response to clicks was compared with the low-frequency slope of the phase characteristic. The comparison should have been made with the high-frequency slope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7358907     DOI: 10.1121/1.383900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

5.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Instrumentation for studies of cochlear mechanics: from von Békésy forward.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Basilar-membrane responses to broadband noise modeled using linear filters with rational transfer functions.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Yun-Hui Fan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Cochlear delays and traveling waves: comments on 'Experimental look at cochlear mechanics'.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1994 May-Jun

Review 9.  A resonance approach to cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrew Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.