Literature DB >> 2312528

Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

D L Carman1, R H Browne, J G Birch.   

Abstract

Interobserver variations for measurements of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who had kyphosis were comparable with those on the radiographs of patients who had scoliosis. Four staff orthopaedists and one physical therapist measured eight radiographs that showed scoliosis and twenty that showed kyphosis. The measurements were made on two occasions and in random order. For scoliosis, the average difference between readings was 3.8 degrees, and 95 per cent of the differences were 8 degrees or less (range, 0 to 10 degrees). These findings were in keeping with those of other published reports. For kyphosis, the average difference between readings was 3.3 degrees, and 95 per cent of the differences were 7 degrees or less (range, 0 to 30 degrees). One investigator rated the kyphosis radiographs with respect to clarity. There was a trend to less variation with clearer radiographs, but this was not significant. The end-vertebrae were pre-selected for some radiographs and were freely chosen by the interpreter for others. Reliability was not significantly improved when the end-vertebrae of the curve had been pre-selected. Using the statistical method called tolerance limits, we determined that if one were to be 95 per cent confident that a measured difference represented a true change, the difference would have to be 10 degrees for scoliosis radiographs and 11 degrees for kyphosis radiographs. The probability that a measured difference is due to measurement error alone (that is, a false-positive reading) was calculated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2312528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  97 in total

1.  A Kohonen neural network description of scoliosis fused regions and their corresponding Lenke classification.

Authors:  N Mezghani; P Phan; A Mitiche; H Labelle; J A de Guise
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Prediction of scoliosis progression with serial three-dimensional spinal curves and the artificial progression surface technique.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; Jessica Küpper; James Harder; Deyi Xue; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Cobb measurement by chiropractic interns using digital evaluation methods.

Authors:  Jesse Cracknell; Douglas M Lawson; John A Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

4.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Matthew Shaw; Clayton J Adam; Maree T Izatt; Paul Licina; Geoffrey N Askin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.

Authors:  Torsten Kluba; Jürgen Schäfer; Tobias Hahnfeldt; Thomas Niemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiographic assessment of cup migration in bipolar hip arthroplasty: intra-observer and interobserver errors and tolerance limits.

Authors:  V P Middha; K Singhal
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Edmond H M Lou; Phoebe Q Zhang; Lawrence H Le; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Alexander Brunner; Markus Gühring; Traude Schmälzle; Kuno Weise; Andreas Badke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.